Quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy improves risk stratification in biopsy Grade Group 2–3 cancer

Objective: Perineural invasion (PNI) detected on prostate needle biopsy is a well-established indicator of adverse pathology, while the prognostic role of PNI quantification has recently been suggested. We herein aimed to determine whether PNI quantification could universally stratify risks by separately assessing subgroups of patients based on biopsy Grade Group (GG). Methods: We quantified actual PNI foci in the entire systematic sextant biopsy specimens from 840 men, including 580 (69.0%) exhibiting no PNI and evaluated long-term oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Results: = 0.021) groups. Meanwhile, PNI on prostatectomy was confirmed in 98.1% of biopsy PNI-positive cases but was still detected in 72.2% of biopsy PNI-negative cases. Conclusion: Quantification of actual PNI foci across all systematic biopsy sites may provide valuable prognostic information, particularly in patients with GG2-3 cancer. Notably, the mere presence of biopsy PNI may not universally predict poorer outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJUI Compass
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70196
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy improves risk stratification in biopsy Grade Group 2–3 cancer

Yuki Teramoto, Hiroshi Miyamoto
BJUI Compass
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy improves risk stratification in biopsy Grade Group 2–3 cancer

Yuki Teramoto, Hiroshi Miyamoto
article en

Abstract

Objective: Perineural invasion (PNI) detected on prostate needle biopsy is a well-established indicator of adverse pathology, while the prognostic role of PNI quantification has recently been suggested. We herein aimed to determine whether PNI quantification could universally stratify risks by separately assessing subgroups of patients based on biopsy Grade Group (GG). Methods: We quantified actual PNI foci in the entire systematic sextant biopsy specimens from 840 men, including 580 (69.0%) exhibiting no PNI and evaluated long-term oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Results: = 0.021) groups. Meanwhile, PNI on prostatectomy was confirmed in 98.1% of biopsy PNI-positive cases but was still detected in 72.2% of biopsy PNI-negative cases. Conclusion: Quantification of actual PNI foci across all systematic biopsy sites may provide valuable prognostic information, particularly in patients with GG2-3 cancer. Notably, the mere presence of biopsy PNI may not universally predict poorer outcomes.

BJUI CompassVol. 7(4)
University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.