Molecular Engineering of the Helminth <scp>TGF</scp> ‐β Mimetics, <scp>TGM1</scp> and <scp>TGM4,</scp> Reveals a Novel Antagonist of <scp>TGF</scp> ‐β Signaling in Fibroblasts

The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) mimics TGM1 and TGM4 are modular proteins expressed by the parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Each comprises 5 complement control protein (CCP) domains binding the TGF-β receptors TGFBR1 (Domains 1 and 2) and TGFBR2 (Domain 3), whereas Domains 4 and 5 bind cell surface co-receptors including CD44. Despite sharing 86% amino acid identity, TGM1 and TGM4 differ functionally in key respects of affinity for mammalian TGFBRs and interactions with cell surface co-receptors. Although both induce T cell expression of the transcription factor Foxp3, TGM1 activates intracellular SMAD signaling in fibroblasts, whereas conversely, TGM4 blocks SMAD responses to TGF-β or TGM1 in fibroblasts. By recombining and/or deleting domains, we identified that the TGFBR1-binding Domains 1 and 2 of TGM4 confer antagonist activity, which is dependent on the CD44 co-receptor interacting domains (Domains 4 and 5); antagonism is enhanced but not fully dependent on binding to TGFBR2. TGMs lack interchain disulfide bonds, in distinction to TGF-β, which is a covalently linked dimeric cytokine. Dimerization of TGM4 as an Fc fusion protein converted it from an inhibitor to an activator of SMAD signaling in fibroblasts and enhanced Foxp3 induction, indicating that high avidity interactions (either monomer/dimer on T cells or only dimer on fibroblasts) drive TGF-β signaling. However, when TGM4 is below an avidity threshold, it binds receptors in an antagonistic mode. These results advance our understanding of the mechanism of action of these parasite-encoded products and uncover new tools modulating TGF-β functions in health and disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The FASEB Journal
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202503194r
Primary Topic
Parasites and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular Engineering of the Helminth TGF ‐β Mimetics, TGM1 and TGM4, Reveals a Novel Antagonist of TGF ‐β Signaling in Fibroblasts

Danielle J. Smyth, Rick M. Maizels, Tiffany Campion, Kyle T. Cunningham et al.
The FASEB Journal
Parasites and Host Interactions
article

Molecular Engineering of the Helminth TGF ‐β Mimetics, TGM1 and TGM4, Reveals a Novel Antagonist of TGF ‐β Signaling in Fibroblasts

Danielle J. Smyth, Rick M. Maizels, Tiffany Campion, Kyle T. Cunningham, Andrew P. Hinck, Shashi Prakash Singh, Peter ten Dijke, Anna Heawood, Ruby White, Anna Sanders, Beth Thompson, Luke Power, Anja Duffy, Claire Ciancia, Maarten van Dinther, Nadia Davis
article en

Abstract

The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) mimics TGM1 and TGM4 are modular proteins expressed by the parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Each comprises 5 complement control protein (CCP) domains binding the TGF-β receptors TGFBR1 (Domains 1 and 2) and TGFBR2 (Domain 3), whereas Domains 4 and 5 bind cell surface co-receptors including CD44. Despite sharing 86% amino acid identity, TGM1 and TGM4 differ functionally in key respects of affinity for mammalian TGFBRs and interactions with cell surface co-receptors. Although both induce T cell expression of the transcription factor Foxp3, TGM1 activates intracellular SMAD signaling in fibroblasts, whereas conversely, TGM4 blocks SMAD responses to TGF-β or TGM1 in fibroblasts. By recombining and/or deleting domains, we identified that the TGFBR1-binding Domains 1 and 2 of TGM4 confer antagonist activity, which is dependent on the CD44 co-receptor interacting domains (Domains 4 and 5); antagonism is enhanced but not fully dependent on binding to TGFBR2. TGMs lack interchain disulfide bonds, in distinction to TGF-β, which is a covalently linked dimeric cytokine. Dimerization of TGM4 as an Fc fusion protein converted it from an inhibitor to an activator of SMAD signaling in fibroblasts and enhanced Foxp3 induction, indicating that high avidity interactions (either monomer/dimer on T cells or only dimer on fibroblasts) drive TGF-β signaling. However, when TGM4 is below an avidity threshold, it binds receptors in an antagonistic mode. These results advance our understanding of the mechanism of action of these parasite-encoded products and uncover new tools modulating TGF-β functions in health and disease.

The FASEB JournalVol. 40(7)
Champalimaud Foundation (PT), Inserm (FR), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Dundee (GB), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), NYU Langone Health (US), Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (FR), Wellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology (GB), Oncode Institute (NL), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA), New York University (US), Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Wellcome Trust, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Parasites and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.