Objectively measured physical activity following lumbar decompression surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lumbar decompression surgery reliably improves pain and disability in lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis, but whether these symptomatic gains translate into greater free-living physical activity (PA) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates postoperative changes in objectively measured PA, and its association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched to identify studies reporting objectively measured PA after lumbar decompression, including laminectomy, laminotomy, foraminotomy and discectomy. Ten studies (n = 549) met inclusion criteria, with six (n = 199) included in a random-effects meta-analysis of standardised mean change (SMC) in PA volume at 3 and 6 months. Meta-analysis demonstrated small, non-significant improvements in PA volume at 3 months (SMC 0.26; 95% CI -0.16, 0.69) and 6 months (SMC 0.25; 95% CI -0.13, 0.63). PA volume followed a consistent pattern: an early postoperative decline, followed by recovery to pre-operative levels by 3–4 months. There were limited behavioural shifts towards higher activity intensities. Correlations between PA and PROMs were weak and inconsistent. Objectively measured PA shows limited and heterogeneous recovery after lumbar decompression despite marked symptomatic improvement. Further work should standardise PA measurement and evaluate behavioural interventions to support postoperative activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44749-1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectively measured physical activity following lumbar decompression surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Milos Brkljac, Iihan Ali, A M Saif Mahmud, Riese Hussain Patel et al.
Scientific Reports
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Objectively measured physical activity following lumbar decompression surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Milos Brkljac, Iihan Ali, A M Saif Mahmud, Riese Hussain Patel, Hassan Tahir, Tim Lindsay, Sree Kanakala
article en

Abstract

Lumbar decompression surgery reliably improves pain and disability in lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis, but whether these symptomatic gains translate into greater free-living physical activity (PA) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates postoperative changes in objectively measured PA, and its association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched to identify studies reporting objectively measured PA after lumbar decompression, including laminectomy, laminotomy, foraminotomy and discectomy. Ten studies (n = 549) met inclusion criteria, with six (n = 199) included in a random-effects meta-analysis of standardised mean change (SMC) in PA volume at 3 and 6 months. Meta-analysis demonstrated small, non-significant improvements in PA volume at 3 months (SMC 0.26; 95% CI -0.16, 0.69) and 6 months (SMC 0.25; 95% CI -0.13, 0.63). PA volume followed a consistent pattern: an early postoperative decline, followed by recovery to pre-operative levels by 3–4 months. There were limited behavioural shifts towards higher activity intensities. Correlations between PA and PROMs were weak and inconsistent. Objectively measured PA shows limited and heterogeneous recovery after lumbar decompression despite marked symptomatic improvement. Further work should standardise PA measurement and evaluate behavioural interventions to support postoperative activity.

Scientific Reports
Imperial College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.