Investigating a race-based strength bias across development: evidence from children, adolescents, and adults

White adults perceive Black men as stronger, taller, heavier, and more capable of harm than White men of the same size. The current study aimed to investigate the development of this race-based size bias. Children (6–11 years), adolescents (12–17 years), and adults (18+-year-old college students) judged the strength, height, and weight of Black and White characters who participated in negative interactions; we recruited a racially diverse sample, though most participants in the final sample were White individuals. Although we did not find consistent evidence for biases related to height or weight, we did identify age-related differences in a race-based bias related to strength across development. Children's strength ratings depended on the actions characters engaged in, but not their race; adolescents ratings depended separately on actions and race; adults' race-based biases for strength varied by actions. These findings are discussed as to how they might relate to how a race-based size biases seen in adulthood emerges across development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Developmental Psychology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2026.1644795
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating a race-based strength bias across development: evidence from children, adolescents, and adults

Julia Wefferling, Paul Muentener
Frontiers in Developmental Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Investigating a race-based strength bias across development: evidence from children, adolescents, and adults

Julia Wefferling, Paul Muentener
article en

Abstract

White adults perceive Black men as stronger, taller, heavier, and more capable of harm than White men of the same size. The current study aimed to investigate the development of this race-based size bias. Children (6–11 years), adolescents (12–17 years), and adults (18+-year-old college students) judged the strength, height, and weight of Black and White characters who participated in negative interactions; we recruited a racially diverse sample, though most participants in the final sample were White individuals. Although we did not find consistent evidence for biases related to height or weight, we did identify age-related differences in a race-based bias related to strength across development. Children's strength ratings depended on the actions characters engaged in, but not their race; adolescents ratings depended separately on actions and race; adults' race-based biases for strength varied by actions. These findings are discussed as to how they might relate to how a race-based size biases seen in adulthood emerges across development.

Frontiers in Developmental PsychologyVol. 4
Tufts University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating a race-based strength bias across development: evidence from children, adolescents, and adults — Julia Wefferling, Paul Muentener · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS