Grounding‐Zone Wedge Formation and Effects on Ice‐Stream Retreat and Stability

Abstract Ice streams deposit sediment at their grounding lines, where ice reaches flotation. Grounding Zone Wedge (GZW) deposits indicate stillstands in past grounding‐line retreat, and are thought to stabilize grounding lines by reducing local water depth, restricting ice flow. However, the mechanisms of GZW growth are uncertain, as are the effects of sedimentation on a retreating grounding line prior to GZW formation. We develop a 1‐D coupled model of ice flow and sediment evolution, considering simplified treatments of both subglacial deposition of deforming sediments, and proglacial melt‐out of entrained sediments from ice shelves. A refined grid near the grounding line resolves small sediment features and their effect on ice dynamics. The model simulates the growth of low‐amplitude, prograding, asymmetric features consistent with observed GZWs. We find that the characteristic shape of GZWs arises from the coupling of sedimentation and ice dynamics. This mechanism is consistent with deposition from either deforming or entrained sediments, and does not require an ice shelf to limit vertical GZW growth. We also find that during grounding‐line retreat, sedimentation provides a stabilizing feedback when other factors initially slow retreat. This may turn a slowdown in retreat into a long stillstand, even when ice fluxes are far out of equilibrium. The feedback depends on total sediment flux and its spatial pattern of deposition, making these priorities for future study. Our study suggests that sedimentation might significantly extend pauses in deglaciation, and the model provides a new tool for exploring links between ice‐stream dynamics and submarine landforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jf008509
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grounding‐Zone Wedge Formation and Effects on Ice‐Stream Retreat and Stability

L. A. Stearns, John E. Christian, Alexander A. Robel, G. A. Catania et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Grounding‐Zone Wedge Formation and Effects on Ice‐Stream Retreat and Stability

L. A. Stearns, John E. Christian, Alexander A. Robel, G. A. Catania, Santiago Munevar Garcia, Lauren E. Miller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ice streams deposit sediment at their grounding lines, where ice reaches flotation. Grounding Zone Wedge (GZW) deposits indicate stillstands in past grounding‐line retreat, and are thought to stabilize grounding lines by reducing local water depth, restricting ice flow. However, the mechanisms of GZW growth are uncertain, as are the effects of sedimentation on a retreating grounding line prior to GZW formation. We develop a 1‐D coupled model of ice flow and sediment evolution, considering simplified treatments of both subglacial deposition of deforming sediments, and proglacial melt‐out of entrained sediments from ice shelves. A refined grid near the grounding line resolves small sediment features and their effect on ice dynamics. The model simulates the growth of low‐amplitude, prograding, asymmetric features consistent with observed GZWs. We find that the characteristic shape of GZWs arises from the coupling of sedimentation and ice dynamics. This mechanism is consistent with deposition from either deforming or entrained sediments, and does not require an ice shelf to limit vertical GZW growth. We also find that during grounding‐line retreat, sedimentation provides a stabilizing feedback when other factors initially slow retreat. This may turn a slowdown in retreat into a long stillstand, even when ice fluxes are far out of equilibrium. The feedback depends on total sediment flux and its spatial pattern of deposition, making these priorities for future study. Our study suggests that sedimentation might significantly extend pauses in deglaciation, and the model provides a new tool for exploring links between ice‐stream dynamics and submarine landforms.

Journal of Geophysical Research Earth SurfaceVol. 131(4)
University of the Sciences (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Oregon (US), University of Virginia (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.