Computed tomography for four‐dimensional dose calculation: Effect of detector array length

PURPOSE: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is susceptible to a geometrical error when respiration changes upon patient shift. 4DCT using 16-cm detector arrays, not needing the shift, has been shown to improve geometrical accuracy, compared with a conventional 4DCT (4-cm array), albeit with some Hounsfield unit discrepancies. The 4DCTs were validated for 4D planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: were additionally calculated on its phase images. The calculated doses were registered to the maximum-exhale image, and summed. RESULTS: with 62.76 Gy versus 62.76 ± 0.19 Gy for IMPT plans and 63.79 Gy versus 63.90 ± 0.28 Gy for VMAT plans. CONCLUSIONS: demonstrated accurate and reliable imaging of a lung tumor in 4D dose by IMPT plans. However, it could be affected by phase-sorting uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70550
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computed tomography for four‐dimensional dose calculation: Effect of detector array length

Qianyi Xu, Inhwan Yeo
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Computed tomography for four‐dimensional dose calculation: Effect of detector array length

Qianyi Xu, Inhwan Yeo
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is susceptible to a geometrical error when respiration changes upon patient shift. 4DCT using 16-cm detector arrays, not needing the shift, has been shown to improve geometrical accuracy, compared with a conventional 4DCT (4-cm array), albeit with some Hounsfield unit discrepancies. The 4DCTs were validated for 4D planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: were additionally calculated on its phase images. The calculated doses were registered to the maximum-exhale image, and summed. RESULTS: with 62.76 Gy versus 62.76 ± 0.19 Gy for IMPT plans and 63.79 Gy versus 63.90 ± 0.28 Gy for VMAT plans. CONCLUSIONS: demonstrated accurate and reliable imaging of a lung tumor in 4D dose by IMPT plans. However, it could be affected by phase-sorting uncertainty.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsVol. 27(4)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Advanced Radiation Therapy (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.