The choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter design: variants and clinical implications

The success of peritoneal dialysis depends on the presence of a safe and well-functioning peritoneal access. The ideal catheter should be easy to place, durable, comfortable, and practical to use, while limiting the aesthetic impact and minimizing associated infectious as well as mechanical complications. The first catheter that came closest to fulfilling these criteria was designed by Tenckhoff in the late 1960s. Over the following fifty years, a variety of catheters have been developed, aiming to improve efficiency while reducing associated side effects. However, none of these newer designs has demonstrated clear superiority over the Tenckhoff catheter, and up to 30% of peritoneal dialysis failures are still attributed to access-related complications. Nowadays, the wide range of available catheter models allows for a personalized choice of the device. A tailored approach, combined with optimal placement techniques, and the experience of the nephrology center, can maximize the benefits of specific catheter features to suit individual patient conditions. For clinicians involved in the placement and management of peritoneal access, understanding the principles behind the different catheter configurations is essential when applying a personalized approach to the choice of the device.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nephrology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joneph/aajaf031
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter design: variants and clinical implications

Anna Sikharulidze, Carlo Alfieri, Federica Tripodi, Giuseppe Castellano et al.
Journal of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

The choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter design: variants and clinical implications

Anna Sikharulidze, Carlo Alfieri, Federica Tripodi, Giuseppe Castellano, Antonio Scalamogna, Luca Nardelli
article en

Abstract

The success of peritoneal dialysis depends on the presence of a safe and well-functioning peritoneal access. The ideal catheter should be easy to place, durable, comfortable, and practical to use, while limiting the aesthetic impact and minimizing associated infectious as well as mechanical complications. The first catheter that came closest to fulfilling these criteria was designed by Tenckhoff in the late 1960s. Over the following fifty years, a variety of catheters have been developed, aiming to improve efficiency while reducing associated side effects. However, none of these newer designs has demonstrated clear superiority over the Tenckhoff catheter, and up to 30% of peritoneal dialysis failures are still attributed to access-related complications. Nowadays, the wide range of available catheter models allows for a personalized choice of the device. A tailored approach, combined with optimal placement techniques, and the experience of the nephrology center, can maximize the benefits of specific catheter features to suit individual patient conditions. For clinicians involved in the placement and management of peritoneal access, understanding the principles behind the different catheter configurations is essential when applying a personalized approach to the choice of the device.

Journal of Nephrology
University of Milan (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.