Ethical Considerations for Participatory Research With Children and Young People in Bullying Research: A Rapid Review

Bullying in childhood and adolescence is pervasive and has both short- and long-term psychological impacts, including depression, anxiety, substance abuse, self-harm/suicide and low self-esteem. Bullying research increasingly uses participatory methods that require very specific ethical considerations: in particular, ongoing consent, addressing power dynamics, and protection from harm and distress in the recollection of difficult bullying experiences. We conducted a pre-registered rapid review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, published since 2015, to identify the ethical considerations of participatory research with children and young people on bullying. Importantly, this review itself adopted a participatory approach: children and young people were involved as members of a youth advisory group, youth co-researchers, and co-authors, contributing to the design, analysis, and write-up of the review. The findings of the included articles (n = 30) confirm a predominant focus on protection from harm in such research. Approaches to consent varied widely, from parental-only consent to child and adolescent-only consent, with several studies emphasising child-friendly and ongoing consent processes. Ethical approvals were commonly obtained, though they were rarely discussed in depth. To minimise harm, researchers avoided personal disclosures, adapted activities to developmental needs, engaged teachers and youth workers, and ensured access to support services. Privacy was protected through anonymisation, pseudonymisation, secure data storage, and clear communication of confidentiality limits. Compensation included reimbursements, vouchers, and informal recognition. Studies addressed power dynamics by fostering collaborative environments, valuing contributions, and promoting shared ownership. Reflexivity played a key role, with researchers examining their positionality and emotional responsibilities. Overall, the review highlights the need for flexible, child-centred, and ethically robust approaches when involving children and young people in sensitive research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bullying Prevention
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-026-00351-7
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Considerations for Participatory Research With Children and Young People in Bullying Research: A Rapid Review

Dylan Pidgeon, Azza Warraitch, Megan Reynolds, Kristin Hadfield et al.
International Journal of Bullying Prevention
Children's Rights and Participation
article

Ethical Considerations for Participatory Research With Children and Young People in Bullying Research: A Rapid Review

Dylan Pidgeon, Azza Warraitch, Megan Reynolds, Kristin Hadfield, Ashling Bourke, Ciara Wacker, Numra Rabbani, Mae Treacy
article en

Abstract

Bullying in childhood and adolescence is pervasive and has both short- and long-term psychological impacts, including depression, anxiety, substance abuse, self-harm/suicide and low self-esteem. Bullying research increasingly uses participatory methods that require very specific ethical considerations: in particular, ongoing consent, addressing power dynamics, and protection from harm and distress in the recollection of difficult bullying experiences. We conducted a pre-registered rapid review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, published since 2015, to identify the ethical considerations of participatory research with children and young people on bullying. Importantly, this review itself adopted a participatory approach: children and young people were involved as members of a youth advisory group, youth co-researchers, and co-authors, contributing to the design, analysis, and write-up of the review. The findings of the included articles (n = 30) confirm a predominant focus on protection from harm in such research. Approaches to consent varied widely, from parental-only consent to child and adolescent-only consent, with several studies emphasising child-friendly and ongoing consent processes. Ethical approvals were commonly obtained, though they were rarely discussed in depth. To minimise harm, researchers avoided personal disclosures, adapted activities to developmental needs, engaged teachers and youth workers, and ensured access to support services. Privacy was protected through anonymisation, pseudonymisation, secure data storage, and clear communication of confidentiality limits. Compensation included reimbursements, vouchers, and informal recognition. Studies addressed power dynamics by fostering collaborative environments, valuing contributions, and promoting shared ownership. Reflexivity played a key role, with researchers examining their positionality and emotional responsibilities. Overall, the review highlights the need for flexible, child-centred, and ethically robust approaches when involving children and young people in sensitive research.

International Journal of Bullying Prevention
Trinity College Dublin (IE), Enterprise Ireland (IE), Health Research Board (IE), Dublin City University (IE)
UNICEF, National University of Ireland, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Dublin City University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.