Margin evaluation with fluorescence confocal microscopy during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) analysis of surgical margins during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2022 to February 2023, we enrolled 100 consecutive patients in this single-centre, prospective, non-randomised trial (C2021/32). The VivaScope® 2500M-G4 microscope (Mavig GmbH, Munich, Germany), a laser scanning microscope designed for rapid acquisition of high-resolution digital images, was employed. Following surgery, each posterolateral prostatic margin was analysed using FCM and reviewed by two expert urological pathologists. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of FCM in evaluating surgical margins during RP, comparing the diagnostic accuracy of FCM to final anatomical pathology (AP) and assessing the inter-rater agreement between two urological pathologists (Cohen's kappa agreement). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (i.e., 200 surgical margins) were included. Overall, 37 margins in 33 patients were positive according to FCM. At final pathology, 38 specimens in 29 patients were positive. On a per-patient analysis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FCM were 65.5%, 80.2%, 57.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. On a per-margin analysis, they were 60.5%, 91.3%, 62.1%, and 90.7%, respectively. The inter-rater agreement was 0.64 and 0.61 for per-patient and per-margin analysis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence confocal microscopy is a feasible technology to be employed during RP, offering a good diagnostic accuracy without distorting final AP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70264
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Margin evaluation with fluorescence confocal microscopy during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

Joan palou, Paolo Verri, Pietro Diana, L. Afferi et al.
British Journal of Urology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Margin evaluation with fluorescence confocal microscopy during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

Joan palou, Paolo Verri, Pietro Diana, L. Afferi, Angelo Territo, Y. Arce, F. Sanguedolce, A. Breda, Andrea Gallioli, Ferran Algaba, Josep M. Gaya, Alessandro Uleri, Jordi Huguet, Giuseppe Basile, Michael Baboudjian
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) analysis of surgical margins during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2022 to February 2023, we enrolled 100 consecutive patients in this single-centre, prospective, non-randomised trial (C2021/32). The VivaScope® 2500M-G4 microscope (Mavig GmbH, Munich, Germany), a laser scanning microscope designed for rapid acquisition of high-resolution digital images, was employed. Following surgery, each posterolateral prostatic margin was analysed using FCM and reviewed by two expert urological pathologists. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of FCM in evaluating surgical margins during RP, comparing the diagnostic accuracy of FCM to final anatomical pathology (AP) and assessing the inter-rater agreement between two urological pathologists (Cohen's kappa agreement). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (i.e., 200 surgical margins) were included. Overall, 37 margins in 33 patients were positive according to FCM. At final pathology, 38 specimens in 29 patients were positive. On a per-patient analysis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FCM were 65.5%, 80.2%, 57.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. On a per-margin analysis, they were 60.5%, 91.3%, 62.1%, and 90.7%, respectively. The inter-rater agreement was 0.64 and 0.61 for per-patient and per-margin analysis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence confocal microscopy is a feasible technology to be employed during RP, offering a good diagnostic accuracy without distorting final AP.

British Journal of Urology
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH), Puigvert Foundation (ES), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.