Intrahospital Transport of Adults with Tracheostomy, Laryngectomy, and other Surgical Airways: A Scoping Review of Risks, Processes, and Outcomes

Background Transport of adults with tracheostomies, laryngectomies, or other surgical airways can cause airway compromise, physiologic instability, and preventable harm, yet transport practices remain inconsistent. This scoping review mapped evidence on intrahospital transport of adults with surgical airways, described transport processes and outcomes, and identified priorities for safer care. Methods Following PRISMA guidance, we searched six databases through March 2024 for primary studies of adults undergoing intrahospital transport with surgical airways that reported adverse events, clinical outcomes, or resource use. Reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for nonrandomized studies using ROBINS-I. Findings were synthesized narratively. Results Of 1,118 records, six studies met inclusion criteria, including prospective cohorts, retrospective reviews, and one pre–post handoff intervention, with sample sizes from 48 to 521 patients. Cardiorespiratory alterations occurred in up to 67 percent of transports, and complications affected 28 percent of critically ill cancer transports. Compared with mechanically ventilated non-transported patients, transported patients had longer durations of ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay, and experienced higher ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality rates. A structured operating room-to-ICU handoff reduced omitted information but did not change mortality or length of stay. Most studies had moderate risk of bias. Conclusions Intrahospital transport of adults with surgical airways is associated with instability, complications, and increased resource use, yet evidence is limited and transport processes vary widely. Multicenter studies enrolling tracheostomy patients and testing standardized, airway-focused transport bundles and structured handoffs are needed to inform best practices and improve safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tracheostomy Official Journal of the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62905/001c.155766
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intrahospital Transport of Adults with Tracheostomy, Laryngectomy, and other Surgical Airways: A Scoping Review of Risks, Processes, and Outcomes

Raivat Shah, Isabel A. Snee, Sarah Hughes, Jai’el R. Toussaint et al.
Tracheostomy Official Journal of the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Intrahospital Transport of Adults with Tracheostomy, Laryngectomy, and other Surgical Airways: A Scoping Review of Risks, Processes, and Outcomes

Raivat Shah, Isabel A. Snee, Sarah Hughes, Jai’el R. Toussaint, D. L. Burke, Naomi B Gizaw, Laura C Nairns, Vinciya Pandian, Youssef A Nagaty, Michael J Brenner, Ferdie Z Galicia, Angela M Fetsko, Naomi NS Walter, Linda M Williams
article en

Abstract

Background Transport of adults with tracheostomies, laryngectomies, or other surgical airways can cause airway compromise, physiologic instability, and preventable harm, yet transport practices remain inconsistent. This scoping review mapped evidence on intrahospital transport of adults with surgical airways, described transport processes and outcomes, and identified priorities for safer care. Methods Following PRISMA guidance, we searched six databases through March 2024 for primary studies of adults undergoing intrahospital transport with surgical airways that reported adverse events, clinical outcomes, or resource use. Reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for nonrandomized studies using ROBINS-I. Findings were synthesized narratively. Results Of 1,118 records, six studies met inclusion criteria, including prospective cohorts, retrospective reviews, and one pre–post handoff intervention, with sample sizes from 48 to 521 patients. Cardiorespiratory alterations occurred in up to 67 percent of transports, and complications affected 28 percent of critically ill cancer transports. Compared with mechanically ventilated non-transported patients, transported patients had longer durations of ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay, and experienced higher ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality rates. A structured operating room-to-ICU handoff reduced omitted information but did not change mortality or length of stay. Most studies had moderate risk of bias. Conclusions Intrahospital transport of adults with surgical airways is associated with instability, complications, and increased resource use, yet evidence is limited and transport processes vary widely. Multicenter studies enrolling tracheostomy patients and testing standardized, airway-focused transport bundles and structured handoffs are needed to inform best practices and improve safety.

Tracheostomy Official Journal of the Global Tracheostomy CollaborativeVol. 3(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Georgetown University (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US), NRG Oncology (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.