Bibliometric analysis of reviews of outcomes for adults with a complex perinatal history
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reviews focused on adult outcomes of patients with complex neonatal history. STUDY DESIGN: We searched multiple databases in January 2022 and supplemented by hand searching references in included reviews. Two authors assessed reviews for eligibility. Data were extracted by one author, verified by a second. Counts based on neonatal exposure, adult outcome, and journal type for each review were calculated. RESULTS: Eight-seven reviews were included. Most focused on prematurity. The most common adult outcome assessed was cardiovascular. Papers shifted to publication in pediatric journals over the last decade. Gaps include a lack of reviews focused on those with a history of substance exposure in utero and a lack of reviews on adult autoimmune conditions and gynecologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Reviews of adult outcomes of those with complex neonatal history have moved to publication in pediatric journals recently. We identified gaps in both pediatric populations and adult outcomes assessed.
Authors
- Amrik Singh Khalsa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4609-5194)
- Allison C. Lure (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-531X)
- Timothy P. Rogers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1035-4083)
- Chelsea K. Bitler
- Bimal P. Chaudhari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-949X)
- Austin A. Antoniou
- Alison Gehred
Institutions
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
- Phoenix Children's Hospital (US)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Perinatology
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-026-02609-w
- Primary Topic
- Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00