Promises and performance in brain–machine interfaces: will AI be our saviour?

Abstract Brain–machine interfaces (BMIs) have advanced rapidly in the past decade, yet translating prototypes into everyday use remains elusive. This review critically compares three different approaches—Meta’s non-invasive neural wristband, the minimal cortically invasive Stentrode of Synchron and the invasive cortical implant of Neuralink. We consider in particular the challenges which Meta must overcome because of the three companies, they are unique in their goal of putting BMIs in the hands of the mass market. Whereas earlier reviews surveyed BMIs more broadly, we will focus on how the interests of each company embody distinct trade-offs along the invasiveness spectrum. We highlight Meta’s advances in large-scale electromyography (EMG) datasets and foundational model approaches to cross-user generalization, Synchron’s clinically validated safety and feasibility in real-world home use, albeit at lower information throughput, and Neuralink’s push for unprecedented channel counts and bandwidth despite biological and regulatory hurdles. By synthesizing technical, regulatory, and practical lessons across these cases, we argue that there has not been a single pathway that has yet solved the dual challenge of high-bandwidth decoding and seamless long-term usability. Our novelty lies in contrasting the consumer-focused ambitions of Meta with the medical-first trajectories of Synchron and Neuralink by drawing out common pitfalls such as calibration demands, signal instability, and hype-driven expectations. Looking ahead, we outline how advances in artificial-intelligence (AI) decoding, hybrid multimodal interfaces, and miniaturized wireless hardware could shift BMIs from niche public demonstrations toward mainstream adoption. In doing so, we position Meta’s wristband not as an end point, but as a pivotal case study—revealing why ambition alone is insufficient and where the field must innovate to close the gap between promise and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal Special Topics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02169-2
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promises and performance in brain–machine interfaces: will AI be our saviour?

Benjamin Dunn, Jonathan R. Whitlock, Pearl Saldanha, Melvin Erasmus Vaupel
The European Physical Journal Special Topics
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Promises and performance in brain–machine interfaces: will AI be our saviour?

Benjamin Dunn, Jonathan R. Whitlock, Pearl Saldanha, Melvin Erasmus Vaupel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Brain–machine interfaces (BMIs) have advanced rapidly in the past decade, yet translating prototypes into everyday use remains elusive. This review critically compares three different approaches—Meta’s non-invasive neural wristband, the minimal cortically invasive Stentrode of Synchron and the invasive cortical implant of Neuralink. We consider in particular the challenges which Meta must overcome because of the three companies, they are unique in their goal of putting BMIs in the hands of the mass market. Whereas earlier reviews surveyed BMIs more broadly, we will focus on how the interests of each company embody distinct trade-offs along the invasiveness spectrum. We highlight Meta’s advances in large-scale electromyography (EMG) datasets and foundational model approaches to cross-user generalization, Synchron’s clinically validated safety and feasibility in real-world home use, albeit at lower information throughput, and Neuralink’s push for unprecedented channel counts and bandwidth despite biological and regulatory hurdles. By synthesizing technical, regulatory, and practical lessons across these cases, we argue that there has not been a single pathway that has yet solved the dual challenge of high-bandwidth decoding and seamless long-term usability. Our novelty lies in contrasting the consumer-focused ambitions of Meta with the medical-first trajectories of Synchron and Neuralink by drawing out common pitfalls such as calibration demands, signal instability, and hype-driven expectations. Looking ahead, we outline how advances in artificial-intelligence (AI) decoding, hybrid multimodal interfaces, and miniaturized wireless hardware could shift BMIs from niche public demonstrations toward mainstream adoption. In doing so, we position Meta’s wristband not as an end point, but as a pivotal case study—revealing why ambition alone is insufficient and where the field must innovate to close the gap between promise and performance.

The European Physical Journal Special Topics
Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience (NO)
Kavli Foundation, Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.