Prognostic Value of Murray’s Law–Based Quantitative Flow Ratio in Multi-Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) in multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate whether grafting strategies meeting μFR guidance improve mid-term outcomes following multi-arterial CABG. METHODS: This prospective secondary analysis included patients with available μFR analysis, clinical follow-up, and protocol-driven imaging from the ASRAB-Pilot (Different Anti-Spastic Strategy After CABG Using Radial Artery Grafts) trial. Patients were classified into μFR-guidance-met (all coronary lesions with μFR ≤0.80 were revascularized and all lesions with μFR >0.80 were not revascularized) or μFR-guidance-not-met groups. Outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization) and graft failure (Fitzgibbon grade B/S/O). Stabilized inverse probability weighting was applied to control confounding. RESULTS: Among 141 patients analyzed, 77 (54.6%) met μFR guidance. At a median follow-up of 29.9 (Q1-Q3: 23.4-36.6) months, no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events was observed (μFR-guidance-met group: 16.0% [9.4%-26.5%] vs μFR-guidance-not-met group: 14.5% [7.8%-26.1%]; adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.47-2.66; P = 0.793). Graft-level analysis showed a significantly lower failure rate of arterial grafts with the μFR-guidance-met group (9.4% [n = 25 of 265] vs 34.9% [n = 15 of 43]; adjusted RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.16-0.50; P < 0.001) but not venous grafts (18.8% [n = 32 of 170] vs 22.2% [n = 6 of 27]; adjusted RR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.61-3.68; P = 0.378). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing multi-arterial CABG, grafting strategies meeting μFR guidance were associated with a significantly lower failure rate of arterial grafts but not venous grafts. However, no improvement in mid-term clinical outcomes was observed, and larger trials are warranted in the future (Quantitative Flow Ratio on Radial Artery Graft Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [ASRAB-QUARGO]; NCT05556590).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Asia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.01.033
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Value of Murray’s Law–Based Quantitative Flow Ratio in Multi-Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Jiaxi Zhu, Haiqing Li, Kaijie Qin, Zhaoxi Qi et al.
JACC Asia
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Prognostic Value of Murray’s Law–Based Quantitative Flow Ratio in Multi-Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Jiaxi Zhu, Haiqing Li, Kaijie Qin, Zhaoxi Qi, Mi Zhou, Xiaofeng Ye, Yanjun Sun, Yunpeng Zhu, Hong Xu, Wei Zhang, Zhe Wang, Qiang Zhao, Jiapei Qiu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) in multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate whether grafting strategies meeting μFR guidance improve mid-term outcomes following multi-arterial CABG. METHODS: This prospective secondary analysis included patients with available μFR analysis, clinical follow-up, and protocol-driven imaging from the ASRAB-Pilot (Different Anti-Spastic Strategy After CABG Using Radial Artery Grafts) trial. Patients were classified into μFR-guidance-met (all coronary lesions with μFR ≤0.80 were revascularized and all lesions with μFR >0.80 were not revascularized) or μFR-guidance-not-met groups. Outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization) and graft failure (Fitzgibbon grade B/S/O). Stabilized inverse probability weighting was applied to control confounding. RESULTS: Among 141 patients analyzed, 77 (54.6%) met μFR guidance. At a median follow-up of 29.9 (Q1-Q3: 23.4-36.6) months, no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events was observed (μFR-guidance-met group: 16.0% [9.4%-26.5%] vs μFR-guidance-not-met group: 14.5% [7.8%-26.1%]; adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.47-2.66; P = 0.793). Graft-level analysis showed a significantly lower failure rate of arterial grafts with the μFR-guidance-met group (9.4% [n = 25 of 265] vs 34.9% [n = 15 of 43]; adjusted RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.16-0.50; P < 0.001) but not venous grafts (18.8% [n = 32 of 170] vs 22.2% [n = 6 of 27]; adjusted RR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.61-3.68; P = 0.378). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing multi-arterial CABG, grafting strategies meeting μFR guidance were associated with a significantly lower failure rate of arterial grafts but not venous grafts. However, no improvement in mid-term clinical outcomes was observed, and larger trials are warranted in the future (Quantitative Flow Ratio on Radial Artery Graft Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [ASRAB-QUARGO]; NCT05556590).

JACC AsiaVol. 6(5)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN)
Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai Hospital Development Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.