Performance of the DERIVATE Risk Score 2.0 for predicting major arrhythmic events in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A Portuguese validation study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) remains challenging. The recently proposed Derivate Risk Score 2.0 (DRS 2.0) seeks to enhance risk prediction using three variables: sex, cardiac magnetic resonance-derived left ventricular ejection fraction (CMR-LVEF), and the presence of midwall late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the DRS 2.0 for predicting Major arrhythmic events (MAACE) in a Portuguese NICM cohort. METHODS: Patients with the clinical diagnosis of NICM who underwent CMR for clinical purposes were included in this single-center retrospective study. Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease, infiltrative, inflammatory or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or significant valvular or congenital heart disease were excluded. The DRS 2.0 score was calculated for each patient based on male sex, CMR-derived LVEF and on the presence and pattern of midwall LGE as reported. The primary endpoint was major arrhythmic cardiac events (MAACE), defined as SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), or appropriate ICD therapy (shock or ATP). Follow-up was performed using clinical records and device interrogations. RESULTS: =0.802, p=0.371). CONCLUSIONS: DRS 2.0 showed robust discrimination and calibration in our Portuguese NICM cohort, effectively identifying a small subgroup that accounted for most arrhythmic events. This score appears applicable in our population and may assist in refining SCD risk stratification and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2026.03.004
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of the DERIVATE Risk Score 2.0 for predicting major arrhythmic events in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A Portuguese validation study

João Abecasis, Sara Guerreiro, S Maltez, António Miguel Ferreira et al.
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Performance of the DERIVATE Risk Score 2.0 for predicting major arrhythmic events in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A Portuguese validation study

João Abecasis, Sara Guerreiro, S Maltez, António Miguel Ferreira, Catarina Santos-Jorge, Francisco Gama, B R Rocha, C Silva, P F Freitas, Rita Dos Reis Santos, Francisco Sousa
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) remains challenging. The recently proposed Derivate Risk Score 2.0 (DRS 2.0) seeks to enhance risk prediction using three variables: sex, cardiac magnetic resonance-derived left ventricular ejection fraction (CMR-LVEF), and the presence of midwall late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the DRS 2.0 for predicting Major arrhythmic events (MAACE) in a Portuguese NICM cohort. METHODS: Patients with the clinical diagnosis of NICM who underwent CMR for clinical purposes were included in this single-center retrospective study. Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease, infiltrative, inflammatory or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or significant valvular or congenital heart disease were excluded. The DRS 2.0 score was calculated for each patient based on male sex, CMR-derived LVEF and on the presence and pattern of midwall LGE as reported. The primary endpoint was major arrhythmic cardiac events (MAACE), defined as SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), or appropriate ICD therapy (shock or ATP). Follow-up was performed using clinical records and device interrogations. RESULTS: =0.802, p=0.371). CONCLUSIONS: DRS 2.0 showed robust discrimination and calibration in our Portuguese NICM cohort, effectively identifying a small subgroup that accounted for most arrhythmic events. This score appears applicable in our population and may assist in refining SCD risk stratification and management.

Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Hospital de Santa Cruz (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.