Socio-technical risks of clinical speech-to-text systems: Transparency, privacy, and reliability challenges in AI-driven documentation

BACKGROUND: AI-driven speech-to-text (STT) documentation systems are increasingly adopted in clinical settings to reduce documentation burden and improve workflow efficiency. However, adoption has outpaced the systematic evaluation of socio-technical risks related to transparency, reliability, patient autonomy, and organizational accountability. OBJECTIVE: To develop a socio-technical framework for identifying and governing risks associated with the implementation of clinical speech-to-text systems. METHODS: This study synthesizes interdisciplinary evidence from technical automatic speech recognition research, clinical workflow and human factors studies, ethical guidance on consent and patient autonomy, and regulatory and organizational governance sources. Using a structured narrative synthesis approach, relevant literature was iteratively reviewed and thematically analyzed to identify recurring socio-technical risk mechanisms. The synthesis was used to develop a layered conceptual framework for evaluating and governing clinical speech-to-text systems. RESULTS: Findings show that clinical STT systems operate within tightly coupled socio-technical environments where model performance, audio capture conditions, clinician oversight, patient understanding, workflow design, and institutional governance are interdependent. Key risks include inconsistent disclosure and consent practices, performance disparities for accented speech and speech/voice disorders, accuracy degradation under real clinical acoustics, automation complacency and variable clinician review, unclear accountability across vendors and healthcare organizations. These risk domains informed a six-layer socio-technical governance model spanning technical, human/workflow, ethical, organizational, regulatory, and sociocultural dimensions. CONCLUSION: The study proposes a socio-technical governance framework and implementation roadmap to support the responsible deployment of clinical STT systems. The framework emphasizes transparency, patient autonomy, documentation integrity, and accountable governance to enable safe and equitable adoption of speech-based documentation technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106419
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-technical risks of clinical speech-to-text systems: Transparency, privacy, and reliability challenges in AI-driven documentation

Nelly Elsayed
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Socio-technical risks of clinical speech-to-text systems: Transparency, privacy, and reliability challenges in AI-driven documentation

Nelly Elsayed
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AI-driven speech-to-text (STT) documentation systems are increasingly adopted in clinical settings to reduce documentation burden and improve workflow efficiency. However, adoption has outpaced the systematic evaluation of socio-technical risks related to transparency, reliability, patient autonomy, and organizational accountability. OBJECTIVE: To develop a socio-technical framework for identifying and governing risks associated with the implementation of clinical speech-to-text systems. METHODS: This study synthesizes interdisciplinary evidence from technical automatic speech recognition research, clinical workflow and human factors studies, ethical guidance on consent and patient autonomy, and regulatory and organizational governance sources. Using a structured narrative synthesis approach, relevant literature was iteratively reviewed and thematically analyzed to identify recurring socio-technical risk mechanisms. The synthesis was used to develop a layered conceptual framework for evaluating and governing clinical speech-to-text systems. RESULTS: Findings show that clinical STT systems operate within tightly coupled socio-technical environments where model performance, audio capture conditions, clinician oversight, patient understanding, workflow design, and institutional governance are interdependent. Key risks include inconsistent disclosure and consent practices, performance disparities for accented speech and speech/voice disorders, accuracy degradation under real clinical acoustics, automation complacency and variable clinician review, unclear accountability across vendors and healthcare organizations. These risk domains informed a six-layer socio-technical governance model spanning technical, human/workflow, ethical, organizational, regulatory, and sociocultural dimensions. CONCLUSION: The study proposes a socio-technical governance framework and implementation roadmap to support the responsible deployment of clinical STT systems. The framework emphasizes transparency, patient autonomy, documentation integrity, and accountable governance to enable safe and equitable adoption of speech-based documentation technologies.

International Journal of Medical InformaticsVol. 214
University of Cincinnati (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.