Choosing difficulty: Self-determined versus assigned tasks in motor sequence learning

The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning, from its introduction to its subsequent refinement, has catalyzed a substantial body of research into motivational effects on motor learning with both supportive evidence and critical debate. This paper examines the effects of goal-directed practice, provided either through autonomy-supportive practice conditions-hypothesized by the OPTIMAL theory to yield motivational benefits-or a yoked group or a low-autonomy instructor, on implicit motor sequence learning of a complex, bimanual dual task. Participants practiced a motor sequence in a virtual reality serial reaction time (SRT) task and were either given or denied control over task difficulty as a task-relevant choice. While all groups successfully acquired the target sequence, differences between groups were negligibly small or absent altogether. These results suggest that the motivational effects of autonomy support do not substantially impact the motor learning of complex tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Movement Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2026.103483
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choosing difficulty: Self-determined versus assigned tasks in motor sequence learning

Stefan Künzell, Patrick Beißel, Élisabeth André, Tobias Huber et al.
Human Movement Science
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Choosing difficulty: Self-determined versus assigned tasks in motor sequence learning

Stefan Künzell, Patrick Beißel, Élisabeth André, Tobias Huber, Martin Nowak
article en

Abstract

The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning, from its introduction to its subsequent refinement, has catalyzed a substantial body of research into motivational effects on motor learning with both supportive evidence and critical debate. This paper examines the effects of goal-directed practice, provided either through autonomy-supportive practice conditions-hypothesized by the OPTIMAL theory to yield motivational benefits-or a yoked group or a low-autonomy instructor, on implicit motor sequence learning of a complex, bimanual dual task. Participants practiced a motor sequence in a virtual reality serial reaction time (SRT) task and were either given or denied control over task difficulty as a task-relevant choice. While all groups successfully acquired the target sequence, differences between groups were negligibly small or absent altogether. These results suggest that the motivational effects of autonomy support do not substantially impact the motor learning of complex tasks.

Human Movement ScienceVol. 107
University of Augsburg (DE), Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Choosing difficulty: Self-determined versus assigned tasks in motor sequence learning — Stefan Künzell, Patrick Beißel, et al. · Human Movement Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS