The Biodiversity Paradox in Emerging Markets: Are African Multinational Enterprises Truly Committed to Environmental Preservation?

ABSTRACT Research on biodiversity has centred on multinational enterprises (MNEs) from Triad economies. Although African MNEs command a small share of global output, they operate in biodiversity‐rich sectors. This study examines how internal governance and national institutions influence biodiversity commitment in African MNEs. Using the Upper Echelons and Institutional theories, the study sought to understand the extent to which board independence and board gender diversity influenced firm‐level biodiversity commitment, and whether the presence of a sustainability committee and institutional quality enhanced that commitment. We analysed a panel dataset of 247 listed MNEs from Nigeria, Egypt, South Africa, Kenya and Ghana between 2010 and 2023. Biodiversity commitment is measured with four indicators covering commitment, due diligence, impact assessment and risk assessment. We find that board independence is positively associated with firms' biodiversity commitments, and greater female representation on boards shows a similar pattern across both the composite index and its component indicators. In contrast, the presence of sustainability or governance committees exhibits a weaker negative association with biodiversity commitment; however, this relationship turns positive where regulatory quality is stronger. We identify specific governance attributes that shape biodiversity outcomes and highlight the institutional conditions under which committees operate as substantive rather than symbolic controls. Our findings show that board composition, regulatory quality, and investor attention to substance beyond disclosure carry important implications for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70775
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Biodiversity Paradox in Emerging Markets: Are African Multinational Enterprises Truly Committed to Environmental Preservation?

Kweku Adams, Douglas A. Adu, Rexford Attah‐Boakye, Danson Kimani
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The Biodiversity Paradox in Emerging Markets: Are African Multinational Enterprises Truly Committed to Environmental Preservation?

Kweku Adams, Douglas A. Adu, Rexford Attah‐Boakye, Danson Kimani
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on biodiversity has centred on multinational enterprises (MNEs) from Triad economies. Although African MNEs command a small share of global output, they operate in biodiversity‐rich sectors. This study examines how internal governance and national institutions influence biodiversity commitment in African MNEs. Using the Upper Echelons and Institutional theories, the study sought to understand the extent to which board independence and board gender diversity influenced firm‐level biodiversity commitment, and whether the presence of a sustainability committee and institutional quality enhanced that commitment. We analysed a panel dataset of 247 listed MNEs from Nigeria, Egypt, South Africa, Kenya and Ghana between 2010 and 2023. Biodiversity commitment is measured with four indicators covering commitment, due diligence, impact assessment and risk assessment. We find that board independence is positively associated with firms' biodiversity commitments, and greater female representation on boards shows a similar pattern across both the composite index and its component indicators. In contrast, the presence of sustainability or governance committees exhibits a weaker negative association with biodiversity commitment; however, this relationship turns positive where regulatory quality is stronger. We identify specific governance attributes that shape biodiversity outcomes and highlight the institutional conditions under which committees operate as substantive rather than symbolic controls. Our findings show that board composition, regulatory quality, and investor attention to substance beyond disclosure carry important implications for future research.

Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Bradford (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), University of South Africa (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.