Acupuncture for primary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for primary hypertension, based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and 2024. METHODS: We searched seven major databases for RCTs comparing acupuncture to control interventions. The primary outcomes were changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Meta-analyses utilised random-effects models, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed study quality. RESULTS: = 90.9%). Notably, the SBP analysis included seven studies, whereas the DBP analysis included six studies, and the similar absolute pooled reductions should be interpreted cautiously, given the small and not fully overlapping study sets. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested blood pressure reductions across several acupuncture modalities, though each subgroup contained very few studies. Adverse-event reporting was limited and inconsistent across studies. Formal tests for publication bias were underpowered given the small number of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture may have blood pressure-lowering effects in patients with primary hypertension, but the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity, a small number of studies and considerable variation in intervention type and exposure. Larger, well-designed, multi-centre RCTs with standardised protocols and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and establish optimal treatment parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Pressure
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2654103
Primary Topic
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acupuncture for primary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Yue Lu, Zhihong Li, Fang‐Fang Shen, Hua-Wei Gao et al.
Blood Pressure
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
article

Acupuncture for primary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Yue Lu, Zhihong Li, Fang‐Fang Shen, Hua-Wei Gao, Wei Chen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for primary hypertension, based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and 2024. METHODS: We searched seven major databases for RCTs comparing acupuncture to control interventions. The primary outcomes were changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Meta-analyses utilised random-effects models, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed study quality. RESULTS: = 90.9%). Notably, the SBP analysis included seven studies, whereas the DBP analysis included six studies, and the similar absolute pooled reductions should be interpreted cautiously, given the small and not fully overlapping study sets. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested blood pressure reductions across several acupuncture modalities, though each subgroup contained very few studies. Adverse-event reporting was limited and inconsistent across studies. Formal tests for publication bias were underpowered given the small number of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture may have blood pressure-lowering effects in patients with primary hypertension, but the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity, a small number of studies and considerable variation in intervention type and exposure. Larger, well-designed, multi-centre RCTs with standardised protocols and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and establish optimal treatment parameters.

Blood PressureVol. 35(1)
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Beijing Shijingshan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.