Offline Plan Adaptation in Robustly Optimized CBCT-Guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy: Lessons from a Real-World Cohort

Purpose: Pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT) is highly sensitive to anatomical variations, often necessitating adaptive replanning (ARP) to ensure accurate dose delivery.While cone-beam CT (CBCT) is increasingly used for image guidance with PBT, many centers still rely on periodic quality assurance CTs (QACTs) to trigger ARP.This study reports a large real-world experience with a CBCT-guided offline adaptive PBS-PBT workflow. Methods and Materials:We retrospectively analysed 300 consecutive patients treated with robustly optimized PBS-PBT.All patients underwent CBCT guided treatments, with QACTs performed either periodically(P-QACT) or triggered by CBCT(T-QACT) changes.We assessed ARP frequency, dosimetric and anatomic triggers, temporal patterns, indications, and workflow impacts across treatment sites.Strategic modifications were introduced after the first 100 patients and their effect on ARP frequency was evaluated.Results: Of 761 QACTs performed, 541 were P-QACT and 220 were T-QACT.Overall, 94 ARP were done in 80 patients(27%), with the highest rates in head neck(62%) and thoracic(43%) cancers.The primary dosimetric trigger was organ-at-risk(OAR) overdosage (52%), followed by target under-coverage(32%) and a combination of both(16%).T-QACT demonstrated 97%(91/94) sensitivity for triggering ARP with 41.4%(91/220) specificity.Most ARPs(64%) occurred in the first half of the treatment, with 32% in week 3. Beam path changes(52%) were the most frequent anatomic trigger, followed by target deformation(29%) and setup inconsistencies(13%). Strategic modifications reduced ARP frequency from 35% in the first 100 patients to 22.5% in subsequent 200.Conclusions: PBS-PBT frequently necessitates ARP.A CBCT-guided offline adaptive workflow, combined with stringent image review protocols, can largely eliminate the need for routine QACTs and streamline replanning.This approach offers practical guidance for PBS-PBT programmes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2026.102040
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Offline Plan Adaptation in Robustly Optimized CBCT-Guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy: Lessons from a Real-World Cohort

Utpal Gaikwad, M. Arjunan, Minnal Mookaiah, Sapna Nangia et al.
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Offline Plan Adaptation in Robustly Optimized CBCT-Guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy: Lessons from a Real-World Cohort

Utpal Gaikwad, M. Arjunan, Minnal Mookaiah, Sapna Nangia, Nagarjuna Burela, Dayananda Sharma, Ashu Abhishek, Ramakrishna Kamath, Uday Krishna, Sham Sundar, Ganapathy Krishnan, Srinivas Chilukuri, Rakesh Jalali, Karthikeyan Shanmugam
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT) is highly sensitive to anatomical variations, often necessitating adaptive replanning (ARP) to ensure accurate dose delivery.While cone-beam CT (CBCT) is increasingly used for image guidance with PBT, many centers still rely on periodic quality assurance CTs (QACTs) to trigger ARP.This study reports a large real-world experience with a CBCT-guided offline adaptive PBS-PBT workflow. Methods and Materials:We retrospectively analysed 300 consecutive patients treated with robustly optimized PBS-PBT.All patients underwent CBCT guided treatments, with QACTs performed either periodically(P-QACT) or triggered by CBCT(T-QACT) changes.We assessed ARP frequency, dosimetric and anatomic triggers, temporal patterns, indications, and workflow impacts across treatment sites.Strategic modifications were introduced after the first 100 patients and their effect on ARP frequency was evaluated.Results: Of 761 QACTs performed, 541 were P-QACT and 220 were T-QACT.Overall, 94 ARP were done in 80 patients(27%), with the highest rates in head neck(62%) and thoracic(43%) cancers.The primary dosimetric trigger was organ-at-risk(OAR) overdosage (52%), followed by target under-coverage(32%) and a combination of both(16%).T-QACT demonstrated 97%(91/94) sensitivity for triggering ARP with 41.4%(91/220) specificity.Most ARPs(64%) occurred in the first half of the treatment, with 32% in week 3. Beam path changes(52%) were the most frequent anatomic trigger, followed by target deformation(29%) and setup inconsistencies(13%). Strategic modifications reduced ARP frequency from 35% in the first 100 patients to 22.5% in subsequent 200.Conclusions: PBS-PBT frequently necessitates ARP.A CBCT-guided offline adaptive workflow, combined with stringent image review protocols, can largely eliminate the need for routine QACTs and streamline replanning.This approach offers practical guidance for PBS-PBT programmes.

Advances in Radiation Oncology
Government Medical College (IN), Apollo Proton Cancer Centre (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.