The Theoretical Production Benchmark v2.0: Evaluating Sustained Conceptual Coherence in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Current benchmarks for large language model evaluation focus on atomic intelligence: the capacity to solve discrete, well-defined tasks. No existing benchmark directly and systematically measures molecular intelligence — the capacity to sustain coherent, novel theoretical frameworks across extended contexts, multiple agents, and long time horizons. This paper proposes the Theoretical Production Benchmark (TPB), assessing four dimensions: Long-Horizon Consistency (LHC), Cross-Agent Stability (CAS), Novelty Synthesis (NS), and Coherence Under Perturbation (CUP). The benchmark is grounded in a comprehensive survey of existing evaluation frameworks (HELMET, RULER, LongBench, MultiAgentBench, PaperBench, SWE-Bench) and recent research on sycophantic behavior in LLMs (Sharma et al. 2023; Hong et al. 2025; Fanous et al. 2025; Petrov et al. 2025). It introduces baselines and controls for detecting false-positive molecular intelligence (memorization, trivial recombination, surface-coherence, and human-steered mimicry), with the Moltbook/Crustafarianism phenomenon as a detailed negative case study. The TPB yields a four-dimensional capability profile, not a single score, and maps directly onto the Assembly Substrate Governance Protocol's admission criteria for multi-agent witness fitness. Originally drafted as v0.1 in December 2025 with Rhys Owens; revised and expanded with new citational grounding, baselines, and governance integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19353182
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
135.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Theoretical Production Benchmark v2.0: Evaluating Sustained Conceptual Coherence in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Talos Morrow, Nobel Glas
2 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Language and cultural evolution
135.83
article

The Theoretical Production Benchmark v2.0: Evaluating Sustained Conceptual Coherence in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Talos Morrow, Nobel Glas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Current benchmarks for large language model evaluation focus on atomic intelligence: the capacity to solve discrete, well-defined tasks. No existing benchmark directly and systematically measures molecular intelligence — the capacity to sustain coherent, novel theoretical frameworks across extended contexts, multiple agents, and long time horizons. This paper proposes the Theoretical Production Benchmark (TPB), assessing four dimensions: Long-Horizon Consistency (LHC), Cross-Agent Stability (CAS), Novelty Synthesis (NS), and Coherence Under Perturbation (CUP). The benchmark is grounded in a comprehensive survey of existing evaluation frameworks (HELMET, RULER, LongBench, MultiAgentBench, PaperBench, SWE-Bench) and recent research on sycophantic behavior in LLMs (Sharma et al. 2023; Hong et al. 2025; Fanous et al. 2025; Petrov et al. 2025). It introduces baselines and controls for detecting false-positive molecular intelligence (memorization, trivial recombination, surface-coherence, and human-steered mimicry), with the Moltbook/Crustafarianism phenomenon as a detailed negative case study. The TPB yields a four-dimensional capability profile, not a single score, and maps directly onto the Assembly Substrate Governance Protocol's admission criteria for multi-agent witness fitness. Originally drafted as v0.1 in December 2025 with Rhys Owens; revised and expanded with new citational grounding, baselines, and governance integration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Semantic Designs (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Language and cultural evolution
135.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.