Tibial Component Varus Alignment Does Not Affect Survivorship of Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty With Functional Knee Positioning

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation is increasingly adopted in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In parallel, robotic-assisted (RA) techniques have enabled personalized alignment strategies like functional knee positioning (FKP). However, evidence on survivorship for cementless robotic-assisted-TKA (RA-TKA) with FKP remains limited. This study evaluated revision risk and clinical outcomes after cementless RA-TKA with FKP at a minimum 2-year follow-up and explored whether tibial component varus alignment, age, sex, or body mass index (BMI) were associated with revisions. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive cementless cruciate-retaining or substituting RA-TKAs with FKP between November 2017 and September 2023. In total, 356 patients (381 RA-TKAs) who had a mean age of 70 years (range, 39.3 to 87.1) were analyzed at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The median follow-up was 3.5 years (95% confidence interval, CI: 3.3 to 3.8), and the follow-up rate was 94.9%. Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences in survivorship stratified by tibial component coronal alignment (greater than 3 versus 3° or less varus), age greater than 75 years, sex, and BMI greater than 30 were evaluated using log-rank tests. The forgotten joint score-12 and a 5-level Likert satisfaction scale were collected at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Estimated survivorship at five years was 98.6% (95% CI: 97.4 to 99.8), with five revisions (four periprosthetic joint infections and one arthrofibrosis). There was no aseptic loosening that occurred. Tibial component varus greater than 3° was present in 35.6% of cases. Survivorship did not differ significantly between knees with and without tibial varus greater than 3°, nor for age greater than 75 years, sex, or BMI greater than 30 (P > 0.05). The mean forgotten joint score-12 and satisfaction were 85.2 (standard deviation 20.2) and 4.7 (standard deviation 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Cementless RA-TKA with FKP demonstrated excellent survivorship and high patient satisfaction at a minimum 2-year follow-up, with no aseptic loosening that occurred. There was no association between tibial component varus, age, sex, or BMI and revision detected, supporting the safety of cementless fixation in personalized robotic alignment; however, the low number of revision events limits the ability to identify predictors of failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.071
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tibial Component Varus Alignment Does Not Affect Survivorship of Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty With Functional Knee Positioning

Vincenzo Iorio, Francesco Zambianchi, Fabio Catani, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Tibial Component Varus Alignment Does Not Affect Survivorship of Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty With Functional Knee Positioning

Vincenzo Iorio, Francesco Zambianchi, Fabio Catani, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Sebastiano Clemenza, Mattia Clò
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation is increasingly adopted in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In parallel, robotic-assisted (RA) techniques have enabled personalized alignment strategies like functional knee positioning (FKP). However, evidence on survivorship for cementless robotic-assisted-TKA (RA-TKA) with FKP remains limited. This study evaluated revision risk and clinical outcomes after cementless RA-TKA with FKP at a minimum 2-year follow-up and explored whether tibial component varus alignment, age, sex, or body mass index (BMI) were associated with revisions. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive cementless cruciate-retaining or substituting RA-TKAs with FKP between November 2017 and September 2023. In total, 356 patients (381 RA-TKAs) who had a mean age of 70 years (range, 39.3 to 87.1) were analyzed at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The median follow-up was 3.5 years (95% confidence interval, CI: 3.3 to 3.8), and the follow-up rate was 94.9%. Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences in survivorship stratified by tibial component coronal alignment (greater than 3 versus 3° or less varus), age greater than 75 years, sex, and BMI greater than 30 were evaluated using log-rank tests. The forgotten joint score-12 and a 5-level Likert satisfaction scale were collected at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Estimated survivorship at five years was 98.6% (95% CI: 97.4 to 99.8), with five revisions (four periprosthetic joint infections and one arthrofibrosis). There was no aseptic loosening that occurred. Tibial component varus greater than 3° was present in 35.6% of cases. Survivorship did not differ significantly between knees with and without tibial varus greater than 3°, nor for age greater than 75 years, sex, or BMI greater than 30 (P > 0.05). The mean forgotten joint score-12 and satisfaction were 85.2 (standard deviation 20.2) and 4.7 (standard deviation 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Cementless RA-TKA with FKP demonstrated excellent survivorship and high patient satisfaction at a minimum 2-year follow-up, with no aseptic loosening that occurred. There was no association between tibial component varus, age, sex, or BMI and revision detected, supporting the safety of cementless fixation in personalized robotic alignment; however, the low number of revision events limits the ability to identify predictors of failure.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Ospedale Maggiore (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.