Sex Differences in Self-Rated Health and Cardiovascular Disease Events

Importance: Clinical risk factors, lifestyle factors, and social determinants of health have established sex-specific associations with new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, little is known about the role of patient-reported health measures in individuals without CVD. Objective: To determine whether self-rated health is independently associated with the development of CVD and whether this association differs by sex. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included community-dwelling adults enrolled in the Ontario Health Study from March 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017, with no prior CVD or active cancer. Outcome ascertainment was via linkage to administrative databases for follow-up outcomes to March 31, 2024, and data were analyzed from January 5, 2025, to January 16, 2026. Exposure: Excellent, very good to good, and fair to poor self-rated health. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CVD events (hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death). Cause-specific hazard models with an interaction between self-rated health and sex were adjusted for age, traditional risk factors, lifestyle factors, social determinants of health, and family history of CVD. Results: The cohort consisted of 170 197 participants (104 789 [61.6%] women; median age, 48 [IQR, 36-58] years) followed up for a median of 12.1 (IQR, 12.0-12.3) years. Fair to poor health was reported in 11 661 women (11.1%) and 6381 (9.8%) men; very good to good health, in 75 819 (72.4%) women and 47 865 (73.2%) men; and excellent health, in 17 309 (16.5%) women and 11 162 (17.1%) men. After adjustment, poorer self-rated health was associated with a higher rate of CVD in both sexes. Compared with excellent self-rated health, the fully adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for fair to poor self-rated health were 2.08 (95% CI, 1.80-2.40) in women and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.29-1.64) in men; the HRs for very good to good self-rated health compared with excellent health were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11-1.43) in women and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.94-1.14) in men (P < .001 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals without CVD, as many as 1 in 10 rated their health as fair to poor. Fair to poor self-rated health was an independent risk factor associated with new CVD, and its relative hazard was greater in women than in men. These findings support the use of a simple self-assessment of health to aid in risk stratification in the primary prevention of CVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.4129
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Self-Rated Health and Cardiovascular Disease Events

Erica S. Spatz, Maneesh Sud, Douglas G. Manuel, Dennis Ko et al.
JAMA Network Open
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Sex Differences in Self-Rated Health and Cardiovascular Disease Events

Erica S. Spatz, Maneesh Sud, Douglas G. Manuel, Dennis Ko, Dean T. Eurich, Mina Madan, Olivia Haldenby, Sunjidatul Islam, Michelle Graham, T. Huynh, P C Austin, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Padma Kaul, Feng Qiu
article en

Abstract

Importance: Clinical risk factors, lifestyle factors, and social determinants of health have established sex-specific associations with new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, little is known about the role of patient-reported health measures in individuals without CVD. Objective: To determine whether self-rated health is independently associated with the development of CVD and whether this association differs by sex. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included community-dwelling adults enrolled in the Ontario Health Study from March 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017, with no prior CVD or active cancer. Outcome ascertainment was via linkage to administrative databases for follow-up outcomes to March 31, 2024, and data were analyzed from January 5, 2025, to January 16, 2026. Exposure: Excellent, very good to good, and fair to poor self-rated health. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CVD events (hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death). Cause-specific hazard models with an interaction between self-rated health and sex were adjusted for age, traditional risk factors, lifestyle factors, social determinants of health, and family history of CVD. Results: The cohort consisted of 170 197 participants (104 789 [61.6%] women; median age, 48 [IQR, 36-58] years) followed up for a median of 12.1 (IQR, 12.0-12.3) years. Fair to poor health was reported in 11 661 women (11.1%) and 6381 (9.8%) men; very good to good health, in 75 819 (72.4%) women and 47 865 (73.2%) men; and excellent health, in 17 309 (16.5%) women and 11 162 (17.1%) men. After adjustment, poorer self-rated health was associated with a higher rate of CVD in both sexes. Compared with excellent self-rated health, the fully adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for fair to poor self-rated health were 2.08 (95% CI, 1.80-2.40) in women and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.29-1.64) in men; the HRs for very good to good self-rated health compared with excellent health were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11-1.43) in women and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.94-1.14) in men (P < .001 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals without CVD, as many as 1 in 10 rated their health as fair to poor. Fair to poor self-rated health was an independent risk factor associated with new CVD, and its relative hazard was greater in women than in men. These findings support the use of a simple self-assessment of health to aid in risk stratification in the primary prevention of CVD.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(4)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Yale University (US), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), McGill University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.