Artificial intelligence, institutional quality, and carbon neutrality: a pathway analysis of OECD nations

This study examines how institutional quality affects the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and carbon neutrality across 35 OECD countries from 1990 to 2020. Using a dynamic panel approach and the Augmented Anderson–Hsiao (AAH) estimator, it investigates whether AI reduces emissions and if its benefits depend on governance strength. The results reveal that AI adoption alone is positively associated with carbon emissions, underscoring its energy-intensive nature. However, the interaction between AI and institutional quality has a significant negative effect on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, highlighting the vital role of strong institutions in steering AI toward sustainable results. Additionally, globalization has had limited but positive effects on carbon emissions, while urbanization and the energy transition have shown mixed outcomes. Overall, the study underscores the importance of institutional frameworks in aligning technological innovation with climate goals and provides evidence that AI can support achieving carbon neutrality when backed by effective governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07098-y
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence, institutional quality, and carbon neutrality: a pathway analysis of OECD nations

J C Liu
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Artificial intelligence, institutional quality, and carbon neutrality: a pathway analysis of OECD nations

J C Liu
article en

Abstract

This study examines how institutional quality affects the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and carbon neutrality across 35 OECD countries from 1990 to 2020. Using a dynamic panel approach and the Augmented Anderson–Hsiao (AAH) estimator, it investigates whether AI reduces emissions and if its benefits depend on governance strength. The results reveal that AI adoption alone is positively associated with carbon emissions, underscoring its energy-intensive nature. However, the interaction between AI and institutional quality has a significant negative effect on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, highlighting the vital role of strong institutions in steering AI toward sustainable results. Additionally, globalization has had limited but positive effects on carbon emissions, while urbanization and the energy transition have shown mixed outcomes. Overall, the study underscores the importance of institutional frameworks in aligning technological innovation with climate goals and provides evidence that AI can support achieving carbon neutrality when backed by effective governance.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Tongling University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.