Applying the Target Study Conceptual Model to Measure Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension Treatment Intensification

BACKGROUND: This tutorial paper demonstrates the application of a conceptual model to measure racial and ethnic disparities in treatment intensification among adults with hypertension consistent with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) definition. The IOM defines disparity as differences in health care quality that are not due to access-related factors, clinical needs, preferences, and appropriateness of intervention (referred to as allowable covariates). METHODS: We used a conceptual model called the Target Study to estimate annual disparities in the probability of treatment intensification between Black and White patients seen at primary care clinics within a large healthcare system in the Mid-Atlantic region from 2018 to 2022, using electronic medical record data. We emulated the specified target study through an appropriate study design and the use of inverse probability weighting to balance allowable covariates while measuring disparities. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed a higher percentage of treatment intensification for Black patients compared with White patients, with annual differences ranging from 2 to 4 percentage points. For example, in 2020, the unadjusted difference was three percentage points (95% confidence interval: 1%, 5%). After adjusting for allowable covariates via the emulated target study, Black patients had consistently lower percentages of treatment intensification by 3-4 percentage points each year. For example, in 2020, the adjusted disparity was -3 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -4%, -1%). CONCLUSIONS: The Target Study can implement the IOM definition for measuring disparities in health care. Future research should explore its application across different populations to better understand and address health disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001964
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying the Target Study Conceptual Model to Measure Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension Treatment Intensification

Jodi B Segal, Raquel C. Greer, Aster Meche, HB Mehta et al.
Epidemiology
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Applying the Target Study Conceptual Model to Measure Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension Treatment Intensification

Jodi B Segal, Raquel C. Greer, Aster Meche, HB Mehta, Yea‐Jen Hsu, Romsai T. Boonyasai, Lisa A. Cooper, G. Caleb Alexander
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This tutorial paper demonstrates the application of a conceptual model to measure racial and ethnic disparities in treatment intensification among adults with hypertension consistent with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) definition. The IOM defines disparity as differences in health care quality that are not due to access-related factors, clinical needs, preferences, and appropriateness of intervention (referred to as allowable covariates). METHODS: We used a conceptual model called the Target Study to estimate annual disparities in the probability of treatment intensification between Black and White patients seen at primary care clinics within a large healthcare system in the Mid-Atlantic region from 2018 to 2022, using electronic medical record data. We emulated the specified target study through an appropriate study design and the use of inverse probability weighting to balance allowable covariates while measuring disparities. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed a higher percentage of treatment intensification for Black patients compared with White patients, with annual differences ranging from 2 to 4 percentage points. For example, in 2020, the unadjusted difference was three percentage points (95% confidence interval: 1%, 5%). After adjusting for allowable covariates via the emulated target study, Black patients had consistently lower percentages of treatment intensification by 3-4 percentage points each year. For example, in 2020, the adjusted disparity was -3 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -4%, -1%). CONCLUSIONS: The Target Study can implement the IOM definition for measuring disparities in health care. Future research should explore its application across different populations to better understand and address health disparities.

EpidemiologyVol. 37(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Pfizer, Johns Hopkins University, Australian Government, National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.