Examining prosocial tendencies in men who have sex with men: Potential impacts on blood donation following the 2023 reform

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Men who have sex with men (MSM) historically faced legal restrictions in accessing blood donation systems. While recent policy changes aim to reduce discriminatory barriers, empirical evidence on prosocial engagement patterns among MSM remains limited. This study examines whether MSM differ from heterosexual men in their prosocial engagement in monetary donations, in-kind support, caretaking and volunteering, and whether these differences vary across age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We rely on data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), which is a representative survey of the German population. MSM are compared to heterosexual men with respect to prosocial behaviour using propensity score matching. We estimate regression models, including interaction terms between sexual orientation and age, to assess the differences in prosocial engagement. RESULTS: MSM exhibit a higher likelihood of engaging in money donations and in-kind support compared to heterosexual men. When accounting for interaction effects of sexual orientation and age, we find differences in in-kind support, caretaking and the amount of monetary donations. These differences decrease with increasing age. Although a higher proportion of MSM is engaged in in-kind support, there are no differences in the amount of money donated for in-kind support. We find no differences between the groups with respect to volunteering. CONCLUSION: MSM represent a relevant target group for non-profit engagement, particularly in the domains of financial (amount) and in-kind contributions (likelihood). Blood establishments should leverage recent reforms to build trust through inclusive communication and diversity training. Alternative engagement channels can enhance social participation for those deferred for medical reasons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vox Sanguinis
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70256
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining prosocial tendencies in men who have sex with men: Potential impacts on blood donation following the 2023 reform

Michel Clément, Antonia Leiße
Vox Sanguinis
Blood donation and transfusion practices
article

Examining prosocial tendencies in men who have sex with men: Potential impacts on blood donation following the 2023 reform

Michel Clément, Antonia Leiße
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Men who have sex with men (MSM) historically faced legal restrictions in accessing blood donation systems. While recent policy changes aim to reduce discriminatory barriers, empirical evidence on prosocial engagement patterns among MSM remains limited. This study examines whether MSM differ from heterosexual men in their prosocial engagement in monetary donations, in-kind support, caretaking and volunteering, and whether these differences vary across age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We rely on data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), which is a representative survey of the German population. MSM are compared to heterosexual men with respect to prosocial behaviour using propensity score matching. We estimate regression models, including interaction terms between sexual orientation and age, to assess the differences in prosocial engagement. RESULTS: MSM exhibit a higher likelihood of engaging in money donations and in-kind support compared to heterosexual men. When accounting for interaction effects of sexual orientation and age, we find differences in in-kind support, caretaking and the amount of monetary donations. These differences decrease with increasing age. Although a higher proportion of MSM is engaged in in-kind support, there are no differences in the amount of money donated for in-kind support. We find no differences between the groups with respect to volunteering. CONCLUSION: MSM represent a relevant target group for non-profit engagement, particularly in the domains of financial (amount) and in-kind contributions (likelihood). Blood establishments should leverage recent reforms to build trust through inclusive communication and diversity training. Alternative engagement channels can enhance social participation for those deferred for medical reasons.

Vox Sanguinis
Hamburg Institute for Social Research (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.