Detecting Surgical Glove Breaches: Evaluation of Double Glove Indicator System Performance Using an In Vitro Glove Perforation Method

BACKGROUND: Surgical glove breaches may compromise the aseptic barrier and pose risks to surgical staff. Double gloving with an indicator system improves breach detection compared with similar colored double gloves or single gloving. This study evaluates the performance of market-leading indicator gloves for breach detection. METHODS: Liquid was introduced between layers of breach indicating polyisoprene double gloves (Brands A [six styles], B [three styles], and C [two styles]). Indication area was measured using a calibrated camera at two time points (immediate = 9.8 sec; final = 49 sec). Performance differences between styles and brands were analyzed using Games-Howell and Mood's tests (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: ), with a 4.8 and 1.9 times larger area, respectively. Brand A immediately reached 91% of its final indication area compared with only 49% and 37% for Brands B and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Indicator glove performance influences breach visualization. Brand A gloves, which have unique surface characteristics, displayed the fastest and largest breach indication among the brands tested. Faster and larger breach indication enables rapid detection and response, protecting the aseptic barrier between the wearer and patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Infections
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10962964261430395
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Surgical Glove Breaches: Evaluation of Double Glove Indicator System Performance Using an In Vitro Glove Perforation Method

Katherine Luann Dziak
Surgical Infections
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Detecting Surgical Glove Breaches: Evaluation of Double Glove Indicator System Performance Using an In Vitro Glove Perforation Method

Katherine Luann Dziak
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical glove breaches may compromise the aseptic barrier and pose risks to surgical staff. Double gloving with an indicator system improves breach detection compared with similar colored double gloves or single gloving. This study evaluates the performance of market-leading indicator gloves for breach detection. METHODS: Liquid was introduced between layers of breach indicating polyisoprene double gloves (Brands A [six styles], B [three styles], and C [two styles]). Indication area was measured using a calibrated camera at two time points (immediate = 9.8 sec; final = 49 sec). Performance differences between styles and brands were analyzed using Games-Howell and Mood's tests (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: ), with a 4.8 and 1.9 times larger area, respectively. Brand A immediately reached 91% of its final indication area compared with only 49% and 37% for Brands B and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Indicator glove performance influences breach visualization. Brand A gloves, which have unique surface characteristics, displayed the fastest and largest breach indication among the brands tested. Faster and larger breach indication enables rapid detection and response, protecting the aseptic barrier between the wearer and patient.

Surgical Infections
Mölnlycke Health Care (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.