Understanding and Equivalence of Response Time Measurements in Photodetectors

The response time of a photodetector is a key figure of merit that determines its ability to follow rapid variations in optical intensity, impacting applications from high-speed communication and time-of-flight ranging to ultrafast imaging and time-resolved spectroscopy. Yet reported response times often differ widely because commonly used measurement techniques probe fundamentally distinct physical processes. This Viewpoint systematically analyzes three widely used measurement techniques─the square-pulse response, the ultrafast-pulse transient response, and the 3 dB bandwidth method─and clarifies the specific detector dynamics each technique measures. We identify the conditions under which these methods are formally equivalent and the regimes where their results necessarily diverge. In particular, we emphasize that the detector response time is not an intrinsic material constant but rather a quantity that depends on the device operating conditions, including excitation intensity, carrier density, and device operating regime. By establishing a unified framework linking time- and frequency-domain characterizations, this work clarifies long-standing confusion surrounding response-time reporting and provides practical guidance for selecting appropriate measurement strategies across diverse photonic and optoelectronic applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Photonics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6c00438
Primary Topic
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and Equivalence of Response Time Measurements in Photodetectors

Yu‐Hao Deng, Zeger Hens, Dries Van Thourhout
ACS Photonics
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
article

Understanding and Equivalence of Response Time Measurements in Photodetectors

Yu‐Hao Deng, Zeger Hens, Dries Van Thourhout
article en

Abstract

The response time of a photodetector is a key figure of merit that determines its ability to follow rapid variations in optical intensity, impacting applications from high-speed communication and time-of-flight ranging to ultrafast imaging and time-resolved spectroscopy. Yet reported response times often differ widely because commonly used measurement techniques probe fundamentally distinct physical processes. This Viewpoint systematically analyzes three widely used measurement techniques─the square-pulse response, the ultrafast-pulse transient response, and the 3 dB bandwidth method─and clarifies the specific detector dynamics each technique measures. We identify the conditions under which these methods are formally equivalent and the regimes where their results necessarily diverge. In particular, we emphasize that the detector response time is not an intrinsic material constant but rather a quantity that depends on the device operating conditions, including excitation intensity, carrier density, and device operating regime. By establishing a unified framework linking time- and frequency-domain characterizations, this work clarifies long-standing confusion surrounding response-time reporting and provides practical guidance for selecting appropriate measurement strategies across diverse photonic and optoelectronic applications.

ACS PhotonicsVol. 13(7)
Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Photonics (United States) (US)
Universiteit Gent
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.