Manufacturing Poverty: Pro‐Poor Policies as Elite Strategy in Postcolonial States

ABSTRACT This article develops the concept of “manufacturing poverty” to explain how pro‐poor policies in the Global South function less as instruments of emancipation than as strategies of elite legitimation. Using an interpretive qualitative approach and secondary sources from Scopus and Web of Science, the study identifies three interrelated dimensions of poverty fabrication. First, global structures: neoliberal ideology, mediated through international financial institutions, frames poverty reduction within market logics that reinforce dependency. Second, domestic mechanisms: ruling elites selectively appropriate these frameworks, transforming poverty into a political resource through patronage and clientelism. Third, populist programs: welfare initiatives such as cash transfers or social cards, while symbolically pro‐poor, entrench dependency and electoral loyalty rather than structural transformation. The article contributes theoretically by reframing poverty policy as a technology of rule and normatively by urging post‐neoliberal, post‐capitalist alternatives that prioritize redistribution, dignity, and autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poverty & Public Policy
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.70059
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manufacturing Poverty: Pro‐Poor Policies as Elite Strategy in Postcolonial States

Isnaini Muallidin
Poverty & Public Policy
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Manufacturing Poverty: Pro‐Poor Policies as Elite Strategy in Postcolonial States

Isnaini Muallidin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article develops the concept of “manufacturing poverty” to explain how pro‐poor policies in the Global South function less as instruments of emancipation than as strategies of elite legitimation. Using an interpretive qualitative approach and secondary sources from Scopus and Web of Science, the study identifies three interrelated dimensions of poverty fabrication. First, global structures: neoliberal ideology, mediated through international financial institutions, frames poverty reduction within market logics that reinforce dependency. Second, domestic mechanisms: ruling elites selectively appropriate these frameworks, transforming poverty into a political resource through patronage and clientelism. Third, populist programs: welfare initiatives such as cash transfers or social cards, while symbolically pro‐poor, entrench dependency and electoral loyalty rather than structural transformation. The article contributes theoretically by reframing poverty policy as a technology of rule and normatively by urging post‐neoliberal, post‐capitalist alternatives that prioritize redistribution, dignity, and autonomy.

Poverty & Public PolicyVol. 18(2)
Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta (ID)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.