A colloquium at the intersection of law, society, and cognition: integrating sociological and philosophical paradigms with the cognitive sciences

This article introduces the works presented at the Colloquium on the intersections of law, society, and cognition, which brought into dialogue socio-legal studies, legal realism, legal philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience. The contributions collected in this issue challenge the idea that legal norms, reasoning, and decision-making can be understood as autonomous from the cognitive, emotional, and social conditions in which they emerge and operate. Across topics such as heuristics and biases, intuition, normativity, responsibility, artificial intelligence, and legal education, the special issue shows how cognition shapes both the application of law and the formation of legal judgment. Taken together, these essays argue for an interdisciplinary and socio-cognitive approach to law, capable of integrating empirical research with theoretical reflection in order to better understand legal practice and its institutional implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2673
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A colloquium at the intersection of law, society, and cognition: integrating sociological and philosophical paradigms with the cognitive sciences

Giovanni Bombelli, Daniele Velo Dalbrenta, Luigi Cominelli
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

A colloquium at the intersection of law, society, and cognition: integrating sociological and philosophical paradigms with the cognitive sciences

Giovanni Bombelli, Daniele Velo Dalbrenta, Luigi Cominelli
article en

Abstract

This article introduces the works presented at the Colloquium on the intersections of law, society, and cognition, which brought into dialogue socio-legal studies, legal realism, legal philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience. The contributions collected in this issue challenge the idea that legal norms, reasoning, and decision-making can be understood as autonomous from the cognitive, emotional, and social conditions in which they emerge and operate. Across topics such as heuristics and biases, intuition, normativity, responsibility, artificial intelligence, and legal education, the special issue shows how cognition shapes both the application of law and the formation of legal judgment. Taken together, these essays argue for an interdisciplinary and socio-cognitive approach to law, capable of integrating empirical research with theoretical reflection in order to better understand legal practice and its institutional implications.

Oñati Socio-legal SeriesVol. 16(2)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Verona (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of the Sacred Heart (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.