Midazolam as premedication for less invasive surfactant administration: a prospective single-centre audit

BACKGROUND: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is now a routinely practised method of administration of surfactant to neonates with respiratory distress. Many centres routinely use analgesia and/or sedation premedication prior to the LISA procedure; however, many different drugs are presently used, and the optimal premedication drug is unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and short-term safety of routine midazolam 50-100 µg/kg use as premedication for LISA. METHODS: This was a prospective single-centre audit of routine midazolam use as premedication before the LISA procedure over a 5.4-year period in a tertiary-level UK neonatal unit. We reviewed rates of procedural success, physiological stability and incidence of side effects as recorded contemporaneously on bespoke audit proformas following each LISA procedure. We also assessed numbers needing endotracheal intubation within 24 hours post the LISA procedure. RESULTS: <80%), n=56 (47.1%). Only 9/119 (7.6%) babies required endotracheal intubation and ventilation within 24 hours of their first LISA dose. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, routine midazolam premedication for LISA was associated with relatively low rates of physiological instability and a high rate of procedural success. Midazolam is a worthy potential candidate for formal study in comparative trials with other LISA premedication drugs, and against non-pharmacological LISA administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004219
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midazolam as premedication for less invasive surfactant administration: a prospective single-centre audit

Liam Willgress, Zina Wells, Dina Sava, Paul Clarke et al.
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Midazolam as premedication for less invasive surfactant administration: a prospective single-centre audit

Liam Willgress, Zina Wells, Dina Sava, Paul Clarke, Fatma Selim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is now a routinely practised method of administration of surfactant to neonates with respiratory distress. Many centres routinely use analgesia and/or sedation premedication prior to the LISA procedure; however, many different drugs are presently used, and the optimal premedication drug is unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and short-term safety of routine midazolam 50-100 µg/kg use as premedication for LISA. METHODS: This was a prospective single-centre audit of routine midazolam use as premedication before the LISA procedure over a 5.4-year period in a tertiary-level UK neonatal unit. We reviewed rates of procedural success, physiological stability and incidence of side effects as recorded contemporaneously on bespoke audit proformas following each LISA procedure. We also assessed numbers needing endotracheal intubation within 24 hours post the LISA procedure. RESULTS: <80%), n=56 (47.1%). Only 9/119 (7.6%) babies required endotracheal intubation and ventilation within 24 hours of their first LISA dose. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, routine midazolam premedication for LISA was associated with relatively low rates of physiological instability and a high rate of procedural success. Midazolam is a worthy potential candidate for formal study in comparative trials with other LISA premedication drugs, and against non-pharmacological LISA administration.

BMJ Paediatrics OpenVol. 10(1)
University of East Anglia (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.