Long-term implant retention after impacted elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for forearm fractures, nail protrusion may cause irritation-related implant removal. The primary aim was to evaluate implant retention after nail impaction, and secondarily to assess secondary procedures, complications, and protrusion as a predictor of removal. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of children with diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with impacted ESIN between 2017 and 2024. Implant retention was defined as no nail removal at record review. Secondary procedures were unplanned operations, while complications were adverse events managed conservatively. Radiographic nail protrusion was measured as extraosseous nail length and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict irritation-related implant removal. RESULTS: 160 children with diaphyseal forearm fractures were included. At a mean observation time of 5 years, 132/160 children retained their implants (83%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76-88). Secondary procedures occurred in 30/160 patients (19%, CI 13-26), most commonly irritation-related implant removal (10%, CI 6-16) and refracture (6%, CI 3-10). Complications occurred in 19/160 patients (12%, CI 7-18), including superficial radial nerve symptoms (7/160; 4.4%) and irritation without implant removal (6/160; 3.8%). A protrusion threshold of 3.3 mm predicted irritation-related implant removal (AUC 0.79, CI 0.71-0.86; sensitivity 100%, CI 83-100; specificity 55%, CI 49-61). No irritation-related removals occurred below this threshold. CONCLUSION: Impacted ESIN was associated with high long-term implant retention, although secondary procedures and complications occurred in about one-third of the patients. A protrusion threshold of 3 mm was linked to irritation-related removal and may guide implant retention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45693
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term implant retention after impacted elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a retrospective cohort study

Jan Egil Brattgjerd, Christer Aasheim, Vera B. Halvorsen, Christoffer Fotland et al.
Acta Orthopaedica
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Long-term implant retention after impacted elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a retrospective cohort study

Jan Egil Brattgjerd, Christer Aasheim, Vera B. Halvorsen, Christoffer Fotland, Astrid Rosenberg
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for forearm fractures, nail protrusion may cause irritation-related implant removal. The primary aim was to evaluate implant retention after nail impaction, and secondarily to assess secondary procedures, complications, and protrusion as a predictor of removal. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of children with diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with impacted ESIN between 2017 and 2024. Implant retention was defined as no nail removal at record review. Secondary procedures were unplanned operations, while complications were adverse events managed conservatively. Radiographic nail protrusion was measured as extraosseous nail length and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict irritation-related implant removal. RESULTS: 160 children with diaphyseal forearm fractures were included. At a mean observation time of 5 years, 132/160 children retained their implants (83%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76-88). Secondary procedures occurred in 30/160 patients (19%, CI 13-26), most commonly irritation-related implant removal (10%, CI 6-16) and refracture (6%, CI 3-10). Complications occurred in 19/160 patients (12%, CI 7-18), including superficial radial nerve symptoms (7/160; 4.4%) and irritation without implant removal (6/160; 3.8%). A protrusion threshold of 3.3 mm predicted irritation-related implant removal (AUC 0.79, CI 0.71-0.86; sensitivity 100%, CI 83-100; specificity 55%, CI 49-61). No irritation-related removals occurred below this threshold. CONCLUSION: Impacted ESIN was associated with high long-term implant retention, although secondary procedures and complications occurred in about one-third of the patients. A protrusion threshold of 3 mm was linked to irritation-related removal and may guide implant retention.

Acta OrthopaedicaVol. 97
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.