Vulnerability of people in wood-frame buildings to rapid flow-type landslides

Abstract Life-loss vulnerability models, which estimate the probability of an individual being killed given landslide impact, are critical inputs for landslide risk assessments focused on life loss. Land-use decisions in western Canadian landslide-prone areas increasingly rely on these assessments, however, there are no published life-loss vulnerability models for individuals in typical Canadian buildings. To address this gap, we developed an empirical life-loss vulnerability curve for people inside wood-frame buildings as a function of impact pressures from flow-type landslides. It is based on a new method which combines estimates of building damage probability given landslide impact and life-loss probability for people in damaged buildings. It is produced from a dataset of 421 wood-frame buildings damaged by flow-type landslides and 242 people in those buildings. The results show that life-loss vulnerability increases with building damage state, and that occupants are much more likely to be killed in buildings that at least partially collapse, likely because occupants have fewer options to avoid harm as building damage increases. The vulnerability model indicates that life-loss vulnerability increases rapidly from impact pressures of 1–32 kPa because, over this range, at least partial collapse of the building increases to the most likely damage state. The resulting vulnerability curve likely overestimates vulnerability at low impact pressures and underestimates vulnerability at high impact pressures. We provide an annotated vulnerability curve to help users account for and communicate these limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07736-9
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vulnerability of people in wood-frame buildings to rapid flow-type landslides

Sophia Zubrycky, Vincenzo Coia, Philip LeSueur, Alex Strouth et al.
Natural Hazards
Landslides and related hazards
article

Vulnerability of people in wood-frame buildings to rapid flow-type landslides

Sophia Zubrycky, Vincenzo Coia, Philip LeSueur, Alex Strouth, Scott McDougall, Michael B. Porter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Life-loss vulnerability models, which estimate the probability of an individual being killed given landslide impact, are critical inputs for landslide risk assessments focused on life loss. Land-use decisions in western Canadian landslide-prone areas increasingly rely on these assessments, however, there are no published life-loss vulnerability models for individuals in typical Canadian buildings. To address this gap, we developed an empirical life-loss vulnerability curve for people inside wood-frame buildings as a function of impact pressures from flow-type landslides. It is based on a new method which combines estimates of building damage probability given landslide impact and life-loss probability for people in damaged buildings. It is produced from a dataset of 421 wood-frame buildings damaged by flow-type landslides and 242 people in those buildings. The results show that life-loss vulnerability increases with building damage state, and that occupants are much more likely to be killed in buildings that at least partially collapse, likely because occupants have fewer options to avoid harm as building damage increases. The vulnerability model indicates that life-loss vulnerability increases rapidly from impact pressures of 1–32 kPa because, over this range, at least partial collapse of the building increases to the most likely damage state. The resulting vulnerability curve likely overestimates vulnerability at low impact pressures and underestimates vulnerability at high impact pressures. We provide an annotated vulnerability curve to help users account for and communicate these limitations.

Natural HazardsVol. 122(8)
Natural Resources Canada (CA), Geological Survey of Canada (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), BGC Engineering (Canada) (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Natural Resources Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.