Climate change-induced emergencies and inequity: The role of emergency management governance in Canada

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of emergencies such as floods and fires, worldwide. These events disproportionally affect equity deserving groups and are becoming a growing driver of social inequity. Emergency management (EM) governance shapes how these groups experience emergencies and their aftermath. In this perspective paper, we examine the relationship between social inequity and EM governance in Canada with the objective of outlining how the devolution of EM governance can impact local resilience and social equity. We show how the devolution of EM responsibilities has created a system where local governments have little decision-making authority despite being responsible for implementing EM policy and programs. We argue that providing reliable funding and greater local autonomy can improve EM outcomes for equity deserving groups and strengthen community resilience overall. Findings and recommendations are intended to help decision makers navigate complexities associated with devolution and the design of EM governance structures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Climate
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000887
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change-induced emergencies and inequity: The role of emergency management governance in Canada

Jeff Birchall, Russell Goulet
PLOS Climate
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Climate change-induced emergencies and inequity: The role of emergency management governance in Canada

Jeff Birchall, Russell Goulet
article en

Abstract

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of emergencies such as floods and fires, worldwide. These events disproportionally affect equity deserving groups and are becoming a growing driver of social inequity. Emergency management (EM) governance shapes how these groups experience emergencies and their aftermath. In this perspective paper, we examine the relationship between social inequity and EM governance in Canada with the objective of outlining how the devolution of EM governance can impact local resilience and social equity. We show how the devolution of EM responsibilities has created a system where local governments have little decision-making authority despite being responsible for implementing EM policy and programs. We argue that providing reliable funding and greater local autonomy can improve EM outcomes for equity deserving groups and strengthen community resilience overall. Findings and recommendations are intended to help decision makers navigate complexities associated with devolution and the design of EM governance structures.

PLOS ClimateVol. 5(4)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.