Audio quality predictions correlate with perception of processing delays across different simulated hearing device conditions

Processing delays can degrade listening experience, especially where direct and delayed sound paths interact. Although noticeability of delays has been modeled successfully, it is unclear how well models generalize across different types of delays. In this study, the noticeability of frequency-dependent and -independent delays was measured and the GPSMq model [Biberger, Fleßner, Huber, and Ewert (2018). J. Audio Eng. Soc. 66(7/8), 578-593] was tested for its ability to predict both existing and previously unreported data. A good prediction performance (linear correlation, ρ=0.94) was measured. The functional relationship between model outputs and measured results differs significantly between participant groups with different levels of experience but not across conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JASA Express Letters
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0043210
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audio quality predictions correlate with perception of processing delays across different simulated hearing device conditions

Thomas Biberger, Kristin Ohlmann, Birger Kollmeier
JASA Express Letters
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Audio quality predictions correlate with perception of processing delays across different simulated hearing device conditions

Thomas Biberger, Kristin Ohlmann, Birger Kollmeier
article en

Abstract

Processing delays can degrade listening experience, especially where direct and delayed sound paths interact. Although noticeability of delays has been modeled successfully, it is unclear how well models generalize across different types of delays. In this study, the noticeability of frequency-dependent and -independent delays was measured and the GPSMq model [Biberger, Fleßner, Huber, and Ewert (2018). J. Audio Eng. Soc. 66(7/8), 578-593] was tested for its ability to predict both existing and previously unreported data. A good prediction performance (linear correlation, ρ=0.94) was measured. The functional relationship between model outputs and measured results differs significantly between participant groups with different levels of experience but not across conditions.

JASA Express LettersVol. 6(4)
Hearing4all (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.