Is Consumer Materialism Truly Detrimental to Pro‐Environmental Attitudes, Intentions and Behaviours? A Systematic Literature Review

ABSTRACT As climate change intensifies, understanding the psychological drivers of pro‐environmental consumer behaviour becomes increasingly critical. One such driver, materialism, plays a complex role: it has historically been associated with consumerism and economic growth, yet often stands in tension with pro‐environmental goals. Despite growing scholarly interest in pro‐environmental behaviour, ongoing changes in policies, societal values and consumer awareness call for a current and comprehensive synthesis of how materialistic values shape pro‐environmental attitudes and behaviours. The sample of 124 studies was used by applying the ‘Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews’ (SPAR‐4‐SLR) approach in reviewing articles published between 2011 and 2024. We performed (a) a bibliometric analysis, (b) a qualitative analysis of sample articles, (c) identified emerging themes, (d) a meta‐analysis and (e) TCCM‐framework based discussion of findings. While most studies report a negative relationship between materialism and pro‐environmental behaviour, the number of studies reporting a non‐significant or positive relationship is growing. The pooled effect sizes indicated a small overall negative association between materialism and pro‐environmental outcomes, with mean correlations of r = −0.10 for attitudes, r = −0.10 for intentions and a near‐zero effect for behaviour ( r = 0.00). This paves the way for new theoretical explanations for the coexistence of two previously considered opposing behavioural orientations: materialism may have multifaceted associations with pro‐environmental behaviour that vary across behavioural types, cultural regions and potentially distinct motivational forms of materialism (e.g., status‐driven vs. utilitarian).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70154
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Consumer Materialism Truly Detrimental to Pro‐Environmental Attitudes, Intentions and Behaviours? A Systematic Literature Review

Beata Šeinauskienė, Linas Pupelis, Philipp Brüggemann
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Is Consumer Materialism Truly Detrimental to Pro‐Environmental Attitudes, Intentions and Behaviours? A Systematic Literature Review

Beata Šeinauskienė, Linas Pupelis, Philipp Brüggemann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As climate change intensifies, understanding the psychological drivers of pro‐environmental consumer behaviour becomes increasingly critical. One such driver, materialism, plays a complex role: it has historically been associated with consumerism and economic growth, yet often stands in tension with pro‐environmental goals. Despite growing scholarly interest in pro‐environmental behaviour, ongoing changes in policies, societal values and consumer awareness call for a current and comprehensive synthesis of how materialistic values shape pro‐environmental attitudes and behaviours. The sample of 124 studies was used by applying the ‘Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews’ (SPAR‐4‐SLR) approach in reviewing articles published between 2011 and 2024. We performed (a) a bibliometric analysis, (b) a qualitative analysis of sample articles, (c) identified emerging themes, (d) a meta‐analysis and (e) TCCM‐framework based discussion of findings. While most studies report a negative relationship between materialism and pro‐environmental behaviour, the number of studies reporting a non‐significant or positive relationship is growing. The pooled effect sizes indicated a small overall negative association between materialism and pro‐environmental outcomes, with mean correlations of r = −0.10 for attitudes, r = −0.10 for intentions and a near‐zero effect for behaviour ( r = 0.00). This paves the way for new theoretical explanations for the coexistence of two previously considered opposing behavioural orientations: materialism may have multifaceted associations with pro‐environmental behaviour that vary across behavioural types, cultural regions and potentially distinct motivational forms of materialism (e.g., status‐driven vs. utilitarian).

Journal of Consumer Behaviour
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE), Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.