Changes in Clinician Time Expenditure and Visit Quantity With Adoption of Artificial Intelligence–Powered Scribes

Importance: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled scribes have been proposed to reduce electronic health record (EHR) burden and improve clinician satisfaction. There is limited evidence about their associated results across multiple sites and relative benefits for different clinician groups. Objective: To assess the association of AI scribe adoption with changes in EHR time expenditure and visit volume and how associations vary by clinician characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multisite, longitudinal cohort study of AI scribe adoption conducted at 5 US academic health care institutions that introduced AI scribes to their clinicians between June 2023 and August 2025. Participants were ambulatory clinicians. Exposures: AI scribe adoption, defined as receiving access to an AI scribe. This was determined by opt-in decisions by eligible physicians at 4 of the 5 sites. Main Outcome and Measures: Total time spent on the EHR, time spent on documentation, and time spent on the EHR outside scheduled hours or on unscheduled days, all normalized to 8 scheduled patient hours; weekly visit volume. Results: The sample comprised 8581 clinicians, including 1809 AI scribe adopters. Participants were 57.1% female and were split between primary care (24.4%), medical (62.4%), and surgical (13.2%) specialties. Most (74.1%) were attending physicians, with 18.1% advanced practice clinicians and 7.8% resident physicians. In a difference-in-differences analysis, AI scribe adoption was associated with 13.4 (95% CI, 9.1-17.7) fewer minutes of EHR time, 16.0 (95% CI, 13.7-18.3) fewer minutes of documentation time, and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.17-0.81) additional weekly visits delivered. Electronic health record time outside work hours did not change significantly. Changes associated with AI scribe adoption were greatest for primary care specialists, advanced practice clinicians, female clinicians, and clinicians who used AI scribes in 50% or more of visits. Conclusions and Relevance: AI scribe adoption was associated with modest decreases in total EHR time and documentation time and with a modest increase in weekly visit volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.2253
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
221.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Clinician Time Expenditure and Visit Quantity With Adoption of Artificial Intelligence–Powered Scribes

Adam Landman, Amanda Centi, Jacqueline Guan-Ting You, Robert Thombley et al.
3 citations
JAMA
Electronic Health Records Systems
221.93
article

Changes in Clinician Time Expenditure and Visit Quantity With Adoption of Artificial Intelligence–Powered Scribes

Adam Landman, Amanda Centi, Jacqueline Guan-Ting You, Robert Thombley, Lisa S. Rotenstein, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, Scott MacDonald, Rebecca G. Mishuris, Christopher Holland, Katharine Lawrence, Michelle Frits, Jie Cao, Allen Hsiao, Sara G. Murray, Melissa Jost, Reema H. Dbouk, Brian Williams, Ming Tai-Seale, Christine Iannaccone, Bryan Blanchette, Devin M. Mann, Julia Adler-Milstein, Maria Byron, Edward R. Melnick, Karandeep Singh, Lee Schwamm, Debbie Aizenberg, Naga Kanaparthy, Aditi Sriram, David W. Bates, A. Jay Holmgren
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Importance: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled scribes have been proposed to reduce electronic health record (EHR) burden and improve clinician satisfaction. There is limited evidence about their associated results across multiple sites and relative benefits for different clinician groups. Objective: To assess the association of AI scribe adoption with changes in EHR time expenditure and visit volume and how associations vary by clinician characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multisite, longitudinal cohort study of AI scribe adoption conducted at 5 US academic health care institutions that introduced AI scribes to their clinicians between June 2023 and August 2025. Participants were ambulatory clinicians. Exposures: AI scribe adoption, defined as receiving access to an AI scribe. This was determined by opt-in decisions by eligible physicians at 4 of the 5 sites. Main Outcome and Measures: Total time spent on the EHR, time spent on documentation, and time spent on the EHR outside scheduled hours or on unscheduled days, all normalized to 8 scheduled patient hours; weekly visit volume. Results: The sample comprised 8581 clinicians, including 1809 AI scribe adopters. Participants were 57.1% female and were split between primary care (24.4%), medical (62.4%), and surgical (13.2%) specialties. Most (74.1%) were attending physicians, with 18.1% advanced practice clinicians and 7.8% resident physicians. In a difference-in-differences analysis, AI scribe adoption was associated with 13.4 (95% CI, 9.1-17.7) fewer minutes of EHR time, 16.0 (95% CI, 13.7-18.3) fewer minutes of documentation time, and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.17-0.81) additional weekly visits delivered. Electronic health record time outside work hours did not change significantly. Changes associated with AI scribe adoption were greatest for primary care specialists, advanced practice clinicians, female clinicians, and clinicians who used AI scribes in 50% or more of visits. Conclusions and Relevance: AI scribe adoption was associated with modest decreases in total EHR time and documentation time and with a modest increase in weekly visit volume.

JAMAVol. 335(16)
Political Research Associates (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Emory Healthcare (US), Emory University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), Yale University (US), University of California San Diego (US), San Francisco Department of Public Health (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US), University of California Davis Medical Center (US), UC Davis Health (US), Mass General Brigham (US), New York University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Electronic Health Records Systems
221.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.