Mechanisms of Vocabulary Acquisition Persist Under Variable Language Experience

Deaf children with hearing caregivers are uniquely at risk for incomplete and/or delayed first language exposure: their spoken language access is often incomplete, and hearing caregivers who choose to learn a sign language usually begin after their child's diagnosis. Limited access to language during early childhood delays language learning. However, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underpinning vocabulary acquisition, reflected in sensitivity to various lexical properties, are also impacted by variability in early language experience. In this study, we compared the composition of early signed vocabularies among deaf children with deaf signing caregivers (N = 115) to those with hearing caregivers (N = 122). Although children with hearing caregivers had smaller vocabularies, their vocabularies were largely similar in composition to those of the group with deaf caregivers along all tested properties (phonological neighborhood density, iconicity, morphosyntactic, and semantic categories) except for frequency and the categories of predicates and action signs. Infrequent signs, predicates, and action signs were underrepresented in the vocabularies of deaf children with hearing caregivers compared to those with deaf caregivers. These findings indicate that when children are provided early and accessible language input, the cognitive tools driving their lexicon building remain robust, even in the face of variability in many aspects of their language experience. SUMMARY: When deaf children learn a sign language alongside their caregivers, their vocabulary acquisition is delayed and proceeds more slowly compared to children learning from caregivers who are already fluent in the language. Children with delayed, inconsistent, and/or limited early sign exposure successfully learn high frequency signs but are slower to learn rare signs. Iconicity, neighborhood density, and morphosyntactic/semantic category were similarly represented in both groups' vocabularies, suggesting learning mechanisms are largely unaffected by highly variable early language environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Science
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70169
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of Vocabulary Acquisition Persist Under Variable Language Experience

Naomi Caselli, Amelia Ann Becker, Jennie Pyers
Developmental Science
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Mechanisms of Vocabulary Acquisition Persist Under Variable Language Experience

Naomi Caselli, Amelia Ann Becker, Jennie Pyers
article en

Abstract

Deaf children with hearing caregivers are uniquely at risk for incomplete and/or delayed first language exposure: their spoken language access is often incomplete, and hearing caregivers who choose to learn a sign language usually begin after their child's diagnosis. Limited access to language during early childhood delays language learning. However, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underpinning vocabulary acquisition, reflected in sensitivity to various lexical properties, are also impacted by variability in early language experience. In this study, we compared the composition of early signed vocabularies among deaf children with deaf signing caregivers (N = 115) to those with hearing caregivers (N = 122). Although children with hearing caregivers had smaller vocabularies, their vocabularies were largely similar in composition to those of the group with deaf caregivers along all tested properties (phonological neighborhood density, iconicity, morphosyntactic, and semantic categories) except for frequency and the categories of predicates and action signs. Infrequent signs, predicates, and action signs were underrepresented in the vocabularies of deaf children with hearing caregivers compared to those with deaf caregivers. These findings indicate that when children are provided early and accessible language input, the cognitive tools driving their lexicon building remain robust, even in the face of variability in many aspects of their language experience. SUMMARY: When deaf children learn a sign language alongside their caregivers, their vocabulary acquisition is delayed and proceeds more slowly compared to children learning from caregivers who are already fluent in the language. Children with delayed, inconsistent, and/or limited early sign exposure successfully learn high frequency signs but are slower to learn rare signs. Iconicity, neighborhood density, and morphosyntactic/semantic category were similarly represented in both groups' vocabularies, suggesting learning mechanisms are largely unaffected by highly variable early language environments.

Developmental ScienceVol. 29(3)
Boston University (US), Wellesley College (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.