The structural heterogeneity of concepts in scientific practice

This study investigates the structural nature of concept-constitutive information in scientific concepts. Instead of the traditional semantic approach, I adopt a cognitive approach that characterizes scientific concepts as information-complexes, and I advance the structural heterogeneity thesis. According to this thesis, a scientific concept can be structurally heterogeneous, comprising summary information, information about individual cases, and causal-explanatory information, each of which figures in most, if not all, of the cognitive processes underlying scientific practice. By rejecting the view that scientific concepts are always well-defined, I argue that they are continuous with ordinary concepts. Further, I show that structural heterogeneity sheds new light on understanding the phenomenon of “productive research without an agreed-upon definition,” which existing accounts of conceptual flexibility have failed to capture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00741-0
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The structural heterogeneity of concepts in scientific practice

Hyundeuk Cheon
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

The structural heterogeneity of concepts in scientific practice

Hyundeuk Cheon
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the structural nature of concept-constitutive information in scientific concepts. Instead of the traditional semantic approach, I adopt a cognitive approach that characterizes scientific concepts as information-complexes, and I advance the structural heterogeneity thesis. According to this thesis, a scientific concept can be structurally heterogeneous, comprising summary information, information about individual cases, and causal-explanatory information, each of which figures in most, if not all, of the cognitive processes underlying scientific practice. By rejecting the view that scientific concepts are always well-defined, I argue that they are continuous with ordinary concepts. Further, I show that structural heterogeneity sheds new light on understanding the phenomenon of “productive research without an agreed-upon definition,” which existing accounts of conceptual flexibility have failed to capture.

European Journal for Philosophy of ScienceVol. 16(2)
Seoul National University (KR)
Seoul National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.