Quality assessment of fluoroscopic imaging obtained during neonatal contrast enema exams

PURPOSE: The American College of Radiology (ACR) and Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) have published practice parameters for pediatric fluoroscopic contrast enema (CE) exams. The purpose of our quality assurance (QA) study was to assess adherence to neonatal (< 2 days of age) CE practice parameters at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: was calculated for the subjective metrics. RESULTS: 70 neonatal CEs met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. For subjective criteria: A small-caliber rectal catheter was used in 93% (R1) to 94% (R2) of cases. 96-97% of exams included a true lateral rectal view; this view was obtained at early filling in 83-86% of cases. The rectosigmoid index was readily assessed in nearly all studies (100% R1; 97% R2). The entirety of the colon was visualized through to the cecum in 87% of studies. In 74-76% of cases, the appendix and/or terminal ileum were visualized. Observed inter-reader agreement was substantial for all metrics, ranging from 83% to 97%. For the objective quality metrics: 83% of CEs included a scout image. Lateral rectal imaging included visualization of the sacrum in 91% of cases. Radiation dose and fluoroscopy time were documented in 90% of cases. 63% of cases were performed without direct exposures. All 70 CEs were performed without documented complications. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of studies included a scout image, radiation dose and fluoroscopy time, operators should be reminded to collect and store these basic components for every exam. Similarly, while most cases used an appropriately small rectal catheter, staff should be aware to do so in every exam. Approximately one-fourth of studies did not include visualization of the appendix and/or terminal ileum, which may reflect the difficulty of obtaining these views for certain pathologic entities in neonatal practice. Our study demonstrates the importance of continuous quality assessment even in expert centers and we recommend that a Quality Standards checklist be used for all neonatal CE studies, possibly incorporated as part of a template report.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Abdominal Radiology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05400-9
Primary Topic
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality assessment of fluoroscopic imaging obtained during neonatal contrast enema exams

Shyam Sunder B. Venkatakrishna, Mohammad Jalloul, Carmen Cerron-Vela, D. Rigsby et al.
Abdominal Radiology
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
article

Quality assessment of fluoroscopic imaging obtained during neonatal contrast enema exams

Shyam Sunder B. Venkatakrishna, Mohammad Jalloul, Carmen Cerron-Vela, D. Rigsby, Hansel J. Otero, Levy C. Onyango, Dana Alkhulaifat, Savvas Andronikou
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American College of Radiology (ACR) and Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) have published practice parameters for pediatric fluoroscopic contrast enema (CE) exams. The purpose of our quality assurance (QA) study was to assess adherence to neonatal (< 2 days of age) CE practice parameters at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: was calculated for the subjective metrics. RESULTS: 70 neonatal CEs met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. For subjective criteria: A small-caliber rectal catheter was used in 93% (R1) to 94% (R2) of cases. 96-97% of exams included a true lateral rectal view; this view was obtained at early filling in 83-86% of cases. The rectosigmoid index was readily assessed in nearly all studies (100% R1; 97% R2). The entirety of the colon was visualized through to the cecum in 87% of studies. In 74-76% of cases, the appendix and/or terminal ileum were visualized. Observed inter-reader agreement was substantial for all metrics, ranging from 83% to 97%. For the objective quality metrics: 83% of CEs included a scout image. Lateral rectal imaging included visualization of the sacrum in 91% of cases. Radiation dose and fluoroscopy time were documented in 90% of cases. 63% of cases were performed without direct exposures. All 70 CEs were performed without documented complications. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of studies included a scout image, radiation dose and fluoroscopy time, operators should be reminded to collect and store these basic components for every exam. Similarly, while most cases used an appropriately small rectal catheter, staff should be aware to do so in every exam. Approximately one-fourth of studies did not include visualization of the appendix and/or terminal ileum, which may reflect the difficulty of obtaining these views for certain pathologic entities in neonatal practice. Our study demonstrates the importance of continuous quality assessment even in expert centers and we recommend that a Quality Standards checklist be used for all neonatal CE studies, possibly incorporated as part of a template report.

Abdominal Radiology
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.