Development and multinational validation of a multiple myeloma–specific comorbidity index using real-world cohorts: CAREMM-2108

BACKGROUND: Frailty and comorbidity substantially influence clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), yet existing tools such as the IMWG frailty score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) have limitations in real-world applicability and disease specificity. OBJECTIVE: To develop and externally validate a multiple myeloma-specific comorbidity index (MM-CI) using real-world data from Korean and Japanese cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in two parts: (I) development of MM-CI using a nationwide Korean claims cohort of 17,273 MM patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2022; and (II) external validation using two independent multicenter registry cohorts: 1473 Korean patients (2010-2021) and 314 Japanese patients (2008-2023). Multivariable Cox regression was performed incorporating key clinical factors, including ECOG performance status, R2-ISS stage, and frontline treatment intensity. RESULTS: The MM-CI was derived from eight variables: male sex; age 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 years; congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, hepatic disease, and cancer: 1 × (Sex: Male) + 2 × (Age: 60-69 years) + 4 × (Age: 70-79 years) + 6 × (Age ≥80 years) + 2 × (Congestive heart failure: Yes) + 1 × (Cerebrovascular disease: Yes) + 1 × (Hepatic disease: Yes) + 1 × (Cancer: Yes). Risk scores stratified patients into four groups: low (0-2), intermediate-I (3-4), intermediate-II (5), and high (≥6), with corresponding median overall survival (OS) of 72.5, 43.8, 30.9, and 20.3 months, respectively. Validation analyses demonstrated superior predictive performance of the MM-CI (AUC: 0.637) compared to the conventional age-adjusted CCI (AUC: 0.613) and the concise CCI used in the IMWG frailty score (AUC: 0.569). The MM-CI remained independently prognostic after adjustment for ECOG, R2-ISS, and treatment intensity. CONCLUSION: The MM-CI provides a simple, objective, and clinically applicable tool for comorbidity-based risk stratification in MM. It outperforms existing models and may support treatment decisions in real-world practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01475-1
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and multinational validation of a multiple myeloma–specific comorbidity index using real-world cohorts: CAREMM-2108

Suein Choi, Ja Min Byun, Seung‐Ah Yahng, Seungpil Jung et al.
Blood Cancer Journal
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Development and multinational validation of a multiple myeloma–specific comorbidity index using real-world cohorts: CAREMM-2108

Suein Choi, Ja Min Byun, Seung‐Ah Yahng, Seungpil Jung, Si Eun Oh, Jinseon Han, Seunghoon Han, Young-Woo Jeon, Sung-Soo Park, Kazuhito Suzuki, Seung-Hwan Shin, Chang-Ki Min, Jian Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frailty and comorbidity substantially influence clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), yet existing tools such as the IMWG frailty score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) have limitations in real-world applicability and disease specificity. OBJECTIVE: To develop and externally validate a multiple myeloma-specific comorbidity index (MM-CI) using real-world data from Korean and Japanese cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in two parts: (I) development of MM-CI using a nationwide Korean claims cohort of 17,273 MM patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2022; and (II) external validation using two independent multicenter registry cohorts: 1473 Korean patients (2010-2021) and 314 Japanese patients (2008-2023). Multivariable Cox regression was performed incorporating key clinical factors, including ECOG performance status, R2-ISS stage, and frontline treatment intensity. RESULTS: The MM-CI was derived from eight variables: male sex; age 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 years; congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, hepatic disease, and cancer: 1 × (Sex: Male) + 2 × (Age: 60-69 years) + 4 × (Age: 70-79 years) + 6 × (Age ≥80 years) + 2 × (Congestive heart failure: Yes) + 1 × (Cerebrovascular disease: Yes) + 1 × (Hepatic disease: Yes) + 1 × (Cancer: Yes). Risk scores stratified patients into four groups: low (0-2), intermediate-I (3-4), intermediate-II (5), and high (≥6), with corresponding median overall survival (OS) of 72.5, 43.8, 30.9, and 20.3 months, respectively. Validation analyses demonstrated superior predictive performance of the MM-CI (AUC: 0.637) compared to the conventional age-adjusted CCI (AUC: 0.613) and the concise CCI used in the IMWG frailty score (AUC: 0.569). The MM-CI remained independently prognostic after adjustment for ECOG, R2-ISS, and treatment intensity. CONCLUSION: The MM-CI provides a simple, objective, and clinically applicable tool for comorbidity-based risk stratification in MM. It outperforms existing models and may support treatment decisions in real-world practice.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 16(1)
Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Seoul National University, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Seoul National University Hospital, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.