Romanian version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I: Cross-cultural adaptation, criterion validity, and reliability

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common cause of non-dental orofacial pain, affecting about 1/3 of the population worldwide. The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I is recognized as the international gold standard for the clinical and research diagnosis of TMD; however, no validated Romanian version has been available to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to translate and culturally adapt the DC/TMD Axis I into Romanian, and to evaluate its criterion validity and interand intra-examiner reliability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional methodological study followed the Beaton et al. and DC/TMD translation guidelines. The process included forward-backward translation, an expert panel review, and pre-testing on 20 patients to ensure semantic and conceptual equivalence. A total of 140 Romanian-speaking adults (mean age: 34.7 ±12.1 years; 70.7% women) were examined by 2 calibrated clinicians. Criterion validity was assessed against an expert-consensus reference diagnosis. Interand intra-examiner reliability for categorical variables was analyzed using Cohen's κ, and for continuous measurements using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The Bland-Altman plots and demographic analyses further evaluated measurement consistency. RESULTS: The Romanian DC/TMD Axis I showed excellent diagnostic performance, with sensitivity ranging from 85.7% (for disc displacement without reduction) to 91.2% (for myalgia), specificity of 93.5-98.2%, and AUC (the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve) ≥ 0.91 for all diagnostic categories. Inter-examiner agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.78-0.94), and intra-examiner agreement similarly high (κ = 0.80-0.95). Continuous mandibular measurements demonstrated excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.89-0.96). Slightly lower sensitivity for disc displacement without reduction indicates an area for further refinement of diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The Romanian version of the DC/TMD Axis I is a valid, reliable and culturally equivalent tool for diagnosing TMD. Its adoption will standardize clinical assessment, enhance interdisciplinary communication, and enable Romanian participation in multicenter and educational initiatives across Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental and Medical Problems
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/213202
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Romanian version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I: Cross-cultural adaptation, criterion validity, and reliability

Tzvika Greenbaum, Tibor Szatmári, Dragoș George Bălăiasa, Alexandru MĂZĂREANU et al.
Dental and Medical Problems
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Romanian version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I: Cross-cultural adaptation, criterion validity, and reliability

Tzvika Greenbaum, Tibor Szatmári, Dragoș George Bălăiasa, Alexandru MĂZĂREANU, Maria Iacob, Alin Pandea, Mieszko Więckiewicz, Petre Razvan Liviu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common cause of non-dental orofacial pain, affecting about 1/3 of the population worldwide. The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I is recognized as the international gold standard for the clinical and research diagnosis of TMD; however, no validated Romanian version has been available to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to translate and culturally adapt the DC/TMD Axis I into Romanian, and to evaluate its criterion validity and interand intra-examiner reliability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional methodological study followed the Beaton et al. and DC/TMD translation guidelines. The process included forward-backward translation, an expert panel review, and pre-testing on 20 patients to ensure semantic and conceptual equivalence. A total of 140 Romanian-speaking adults (mean age: 34.7 ±12.1 years; 70.7% women) were examined by 2 calibrated clinicians. Criterion validity was assessed against an expert-consensus reference diagnosis. Interand intra-examiner reliability for categorical variables was analyzed using Cohen's κ, and for continuous measurements using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The Bland-Altman plots and demographic analyses further evaluated measurement consistency. RESULTS: The Romanian DC/TMD Axis I showed excellent diagnostic performance, with sensitivity ranging from 85.7% (for disc displacement without reduction) to 91.2% (for myalgia), specificity of 93.5-98.2%, and AUC (the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve) ≥ 0.91 for all diagnostic categories. Inter-examiner agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.78-0.94), and intra-examiner agreement similarly high (κ = 0.80-0.95). Continuous mandibular measurements demonstrated excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.89-0.96). Slightly lower sensitivity for disc displacement without reduction indicates an area for further refinement of diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The Romanian version of the DC/TMD Axis I is a valid, reliable and culturally equivalent tool for diagnosing TMD. Its adoption will standardize clinical assessment, enhance interdisciplinary communication, and enable Romanian participation in multicenter and educational initiatives across Central and Eastern Europe.

Dental and Medical Problems(2)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Banner - University Medical Center Tucson (US), Universitatea Națională de Educație Fizică și Sport București (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.