The Long Road to Acting Ahead: Lessons from the Evolution of Early Warning Systems and Anticipatory Action

Abstract This perspective traces the emergence and evolution of early warning systems (EWS) and anticipatory action (AA). It revisits how major disasters, advances in science and forecasting, and global policy frameworks progressively expanded the ambition of EWS—from hazard-centered monitoring to more impact-based, people-centered approaches—while exposing persistent gaps in communication, local capacity, financing, and political will that prevented warnings from reliably triggering timely action. We examine how AA emerged in the humanitarian sector from these shortcomings as an operational bridge between long-term risk reduction and disaster response using risk information to enable pre-agreed, financed early actions, reviewing evidence that anticipatory interventions can improve food security, protect assets and livelihoods, enhance dignity and agency, and strengthen coordination in humanitarian contexts. Despite having the same goal of protecting the lives and livelihoods of at-risk populations, AA and EWS investments remain fragmented, and they struggle in fragile, data-poor, and conflict-affected settings. Drawing on this history and evidence, we argue that efforts to strengthen EWS and AA must be coherent and mutually reinforcing, building on the broader work on disaster risk reduction and climate-resilient development. The paper outlines concrete action points: align investments across EWS and AA; link government-led and humanitarian mechanisms wherever possible; strengthen inclusive, locally grounded partnerships; level up regional hydrometeorological and climate service capabilities; and institutionalize accountability and learning at scale. By acting on these priorities, practitioners and policymakers can move from pilots and parallel initiatives toward integrated systems that consistently enable people to act ahead of crises. The paper aims to address the following research question: From a humanitarian perspective, how have early warning systems and anticipatory action evolved in theory and praxis over the last three decades?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-026-00709-x
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Long Road to Acting Ahead: Lessons from the Evolution of Early Warning Systems and Anticipatory Action

Arame Tall, Elisabeth Stephens, Stefanie Lux, Richard Choularton et al.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

The Long Road to Acting Ahead: Lessons from the Evolution of Early Warning Systems and Anticipatory Action

Arame Tall, Elisabeth Stephens, Stefanie Lux, Richard Choularton, Erin Coughlan de Perez, Andrew Kruczkiewicz, Arielle Tozier de la Poterie, Janot Mendler de Suarez, Nyree Pinder, Kara Siahaan, Catalina Jaime, Niccolò Lombardi, Maarten van Aalst, Matthias Amling, Irene Amuron, Pan Ei Phyoe
article en

Abstract

Abstract This perspective traces the emergence and evolution of early warning systems (EWS) and anticipatory action (AA). It revisits how major disasters, advances in science and forecasting, and global policy frameworks progressively expanded the ambition of EWS—from hazard-centered monitoring to more impact-based, people-centered approaches—while exposing persistent gaps in communication, local capacity, financing, and political will that prevented warnings from reliably triggering timely action. We examine how AA emerged in the humanitarian sector from these shortcomings as an operational bridge between long-term risk reduction and disaster response using risk information to enable pre-agreed, financed early actions, reviewing evidence that anticipatory interventions can improve food security, protect assets and livelihoods, enhance dignity and agency, and strengthen coordination in humanitarian contexts. Despite having the same goal of protecting the lives and livelihoods of at-risk populations, AA and EWS investments remain fragmented, and they struggle in fragile, data-poor, and conflict-affected settings. Drawing on this history and evidence, we argue that efforts to strengthen EWS and AA must be coherent and mutually reinforcing, building on the broader work on disaster risk reduction and climate-resilient development. The paper outlines concrete action points: align investments across EWS and AA; link government-led and humanitarian mechanisms wherever possible; strengthen inclusive, locally grounded partnerships; level up regional hydrometeorological and climate service capabilities; and institutionalize accountability and learning at scale. By acting on these priorities, practitioners and policymakers can move from pilots and parallel initiatives toward integrated systems that consistently enable people to act ahead of crises. The paper aims to address the following research question: From a humanitarian perspective, how have early warning systems and anticipatory action evolved in theory and praxis over the last three decades?

International Journal of Disaster Risk ScienceVol. 17(2)
Tufts University (US), Met Office (GB), World Food Programme (IT), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), World Bank (US), International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (CH), German Red Cross (DE), Deutsche Telekom (Germany) (DE), Research for Action (US), Climate Centre (NL), Early Warning (United States) (US), Korean Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (KR), Columbia International University (US), University of Reading (GB), University of Twente (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.