Clinical significance of mouth breathing as a marker of severity in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea

To investigate whether clinically assessed mouth-breathing severity is independently associated with polysomnography–defined obstructive sleep apnea severity in children with adenoidal hypertrophy and/or tonsillar hypertrophy, and to evaluate its potential as a non-invasive predictor of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. We retrospectively analyzed pediatric inpatients admitted for planned adenotonsillectomy at Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital. Based on a mouth-breathing score (range 1–7), patients were categorized into mild (scores 1–3) or severe (scores 4–7) mouth-breathing groups. Obstructive sleep apnea severity was classified as non-to-mild [obstructive apnea–hypopnea index ≤ 5 events/h] or moderate-to-severe (obstructive apnea–hypopnea index > 5 events/h). Demographic, clinical, and polysomnography parameters were compared. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of moderate-to-severe condition, and the diagnostic performance of the predictive model was evaluated. Compared with mild mouth-breathing group, the severe group demonstrated significantly higher apnea–hypopnea index, obstructive apnea–hypopnea index, percentage of total sleep time with oxygen saturation < 90%, and lower mean oxygen saturation (all P < 0.05). Mouth-breathing scores positively correlated with apnea–hypopnea index and obstructive apnea–hypopnea index (rho = 0.2173, 0.2102, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified severe mouth-breathing scores (OR = 2.357; 95% CI, 1.354–4.101; P = 0.002), female sex (OR = 0.602; 95% CI, 0.377–0.961; P = 0.034), and tonsillar grade > II (OR = 1.820; 95% CI, 1.147–2.886; P = 0.011) as independent predictors of moderate-to-severe diseases. The multivariable model yielded an AUC of 0.658. At the optimal cutoff defined by the Youden index (0.228), it demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.1%, a specificity of 49.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35.7%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.8%. In comparison, using a mouth-breathing score ≥ 4 as a standalone diagnostic criterion produced an AUC of 0.636, with corresponding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82.4%, 35.5%, 32.8%, and 84.0%, respectively. Mouth-breathing score was independently associated with the severity of obstructive sleep apnea in children with adenoidal hypertrophy and/or tonsillar hypertrophy. These findings indicate that structured mouth-breathing assessment may serve as a simple, non-invasive adjunct to clinical risk stratification for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08238-1
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical significance of mouth breathing as a marker of severity in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea

Jingyi Chen, Yao Wang, Yuehua Chen, Yingchao Yang et al.
BMC Oral Health
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Clinical significance of mouth breathing as a marker of severity in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea

Jingyi Chen, Yao Wang, Yuehua Chen, Yingchao Yang, Y J Zhang, Kaiming Su, Wenke Du, Mingjiang Xia
article en

Abstract

To investigate whether clinically assessed mouth-breathing severity is independently associated with polysomnography–defined obstructive sleep apnea severity in children with adenoidal hypertrophy and/or tonsillar hypertrophy, and to evaluate its potential as a non-invasive predictor of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. We retrospectively analyzed pediatric inpatients admitted for planned adenotonsillectomy at Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital. Based on a mouth-breathing score (range 1–7), patients were categorized into mild (scores 1–3) or severe (scores 4–7) mouth-breathing groups. Obstructive sleep apnea severity was classified as non-to-mild [obstructive apnea–hypopnea index ≤ 5 events/h] or moderate-to-severe (obstructive apnea–hypopnea index > 5 events/h). Demographic, clinical, and polysomnography parameters were compared. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of moderate-to-severe condition, and the diagnostic performance of the predictive model was evaluated. Compared with mild mouth-breathing group, the severe group demonstrated significantly higher apnea–hypopnea index, obstructive apnea–hypopnea index, percentage of total sleep time with oxygen saturation < 90%, and lower mean oxygen saturation (all P < 0.05). Mouth-breathing scores positively correlated with apnea–hypopnea index and obstructive apnea–hypopnea index (rho = 0.2173, 0.2102, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified severe mouth-breathing scores (OR = 2.357; 95% CI, 1.354–4.101; P = 0.002), female sex (OR = 0.602; 95% CI, 0.377–0.961; P = 0.034), and tonsillar grade > II (OR = 1.820; 95% CI, 1.147–2.886; P = 0.011) as independent predictors of moderate-to-severe diseases. The multivariable model yielded an AUC of 0.658. At the optimal cutoff defined by the Youden index (0.228), it demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.1%, a specificity of 49.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35.7%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.8%. In comparison, using a mouth-breathing score ≥ 4 as a standalone diagnostic criterion produced an AUC of 0.636, with corresponding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82.4%, 35.5%, 32.8%, and 84.0%, respectively. Mouth-breathing score was independently associated with the severity of obstructive sleep apnea in children with adenoidal hypertrophy and/or tonsillar hypertrophy. These findings indicate that structured mouth-breathing assessment may serve as a simple, non-invasive adjunct to clinical risk stratification for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Shanghai University (CN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre Inria de l'Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.