Wildlife‐friendly fencing for bison: Assessing success for containment and conflict prevention

Abstract Fencing is an essential yet often disruptive feature of grassland landscapes around the world, contributing to habitat fragmentation and restricting wildlife movement. As conservation and rangeland managers increasingly adopt wildlife‐friendly fence designs to mitigate these effects, there is a growing need to understand how such fences perform for large, wide‐ranging species. The American plains bison ( Bison bison L.; hereafter bison) exemplify this challenge. Traditional bison fencing designs have prioritized containment over wildlife accessibility, driven by concerns of infrastructural damage and competition with cattle, should the bison escape. However, there is very little information about how wildlife‐friendly fencing designs can be adapted for bison management. To address this gap, American Prairie, a conservation non‐profit working to restore grassland biodiversity and rewild native species in central Montana, implemented a novel wildlife‐friendly bison fencing system designed to balance wildlife permeability with effective containment. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of this fencing system in containing bison across multiple management units. Bison escaped a total of 31 times across all management units during the 822‐day study period. Analyses showed that adult males had a higher probability of escape relative to females and juveniles. This research offers practical implications for land managers, evaluating whether these new fence designs can effectively contain bison while maintaining the ecological benefits of wildlife‐friendly fencing and advancing sustainable rangeland management. Practical implication . Our results demonstrate that modified fence designs can effectively contain bison while maintaining the ecological benefits of wildlife‐friendly fencing. Land managers can adopt these designs to advance sustainable rangeland management. Further research is required across diverse landscapes, herd structures, and management objectives to refine these systems for broad‐scale application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70232
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildlife‐friendly fencing for bison: Assessing success for containment and conflict prevention

Daniel Kinka, Nicholas A. McMillan, Josiane Segar, Kyran Kunkel et al.
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Wildlife‐friendly fencing for bison: Assessing success for containment and conflict prevention

Daniel Kinka, Nicholas A. McMillan, Josiane Segar, Kyran Kunkel, Scott Heidebrink, Karley Hohn
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fencing is an essential yet often disruptive feature of grassland landscapes around the world, contributing to habitat fragmentation and restricting wildlife movement. As conservation and rangeland managers increasingly adopt wildlife‐friendly fence designs to mitigate these effects, there is a growing need to understand how such fences perform for large, wide‐ranging species. The American plains bison ( Bison bison L.; hereafter bison) exemplify this challenge. Traditional bison fencing designs have prioritized containment over wildlife accessibility, driven by concerns of infrastructural damage and competition with cattle, should the bison escape. However, there is very little information about how wildlife‐friendly fencing designs can be adapted for bison management. To address this gap, American Prairie, a conservation non‐profit working to restore grassland biodiversity and rewild native species in central Montana, implemented a novel wildlife‐friendly bison fencing system designed to balance wildlife permeability with effective containment. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of this fencing system in containing bison across multiple management units. Bison escaped a total of 31 times across all management units during the 822‐day study period. Analyses showed that adult males had a higher probability of escape relative to females and juveniles. This research offers practical implications for land managers, evaluating whether these new fence designs can effectively contain bison while maintaining the ecological benefits of wildlife‐friendly fencing and advancing sustainable rangeland management. Practical implication . Our results demonstrate that modified fence designs can effectively contain bison while maintaining the ecological benefits of wildlife‐friendly fencing. Land managers can adopt these designs to advance sustainable rangeland management. Further research is required across diverse landscapes, herd structures, and management objectives to refine these systems for broad‐scale application.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 7(2)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Montana State University (US), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), University of Montana (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.