Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case Study on Bevacizumab

BackgroundAs an increasing number of oncology drugs are licensed for multiple indications, sharing information across indications may help improve the precision of estimates for a target indication where evidence may be immature. Visualizing the accumulation of evidence and its characteristics across all indications can help inform policy makers as to whether multi-indication synthesis methods should be considered and guide expert elicitation on appropriate cross-indication assumptions.MethodsThe multi-indication oncology drug bevacizumab was selected as a case study. We used visualization methods including timeline, ridgeline, and split-violin plots to display evidence and synthesis results across 7 licensed cancer types, focusing on the evidence on overall and progression-free survival and the display of results from models with and without information sharing.ResultsThe proposed displays allow for visualization of key characteristics of the evidence to support the assessment of heterogeneity within and across indications and inform the feasibility of information-sharing models.LimitationsThe lack of consistent reporting of data in trial reports limits the visualization of some study characteristics. Tradeoffs between plot readability and the level of detail to include were required.ConclusionsClear graphical representations of the evolution and accumulation of evidence and synthesis results can provide a better understanding of the entire multi-indication evidence base, which can inform judgments regarding the appropriate use of data within and across indications. Interactive plots could help overcome some of the current limitations.ImplicationsThe proposed displays should be used to facilitate discussion with experts on the judgments required to assess the feasibility of using information-sharing methods to improve the estimation of relative treatment effects in evidence synthesis approaches and health technology assessment.HighlightsAn increasing number of oncology drugs are licensed for multiple indications; we developed visualization methods for multi-indication evidence that consider key characteristics unique to oncology.Graphical displays can be used to show the evolution of evidence within and across multiple indications.Clear evidence visualizations can be used as a tool to support evidence synthesis approaches, support policy makers, or guide expert elicitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Decision Making
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x261430333
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case Study on Bevacizumab

Richard Adams, Pedro Saramago, Sumayya Anwer, S Bujkiewicz et al.
Medical Decision Making
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case Study on Bevacizumab

Richard Adams, Pedro Saramago, Sumayya Anwer, S Bujkiewicz, Janharpreet Singh, Stephen Palmer, Anne Thomas, S Dias, E. Smyth, Marta O. Soares
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAs an increasing number of oncology drugs are licensed for multiple indications, sharing information across indications may help improve the precision of estimates for a target indication where evidence may be immature. Visualizing the accumulation of evidence and its characteristics across all indications can help inform policy makers as to whether multi-indication synthesis methods should be considered and guide expert elicitation on appropriate cross-indication assumptions.MethodsThe multi-indication oncology drug bevacizumab was selected as a case study. We used visualization methods including timeline, ridgeline, and split-violin plots to display evidence and synthesis results across 7 licensed cancer types, focusing on the evidence on overall and progression-free survival and the display of results from models with and without information sharing.ResultsThe proposed displays allow for visualization of key characteristics of the evidence to support the assessment of heterogeneity within and across indications and inform the feasibility of information-sharing models.LimitationsThe lack of consistent reporting of data in trial reports limits the visualization of some study characteristics. Tradeoffs between plot readability and the level of detail to include were required.ConclusionsClear graphical representations of the evolution and accumulation of evidence and synthesis results can provide a better understanding of the entire multi-indication evidence base, which can inform judgments regarding the appropriate use of data within and across indications. Interactive plots could help overcome some of the current limitations.ImplicationsThe proposed displays should be used to facilitate discussion with experts on the judgments required to assess the feasibility of using information-sharing methods to improve the estimation of relative treatment effects in evidence synthesis approaches and health technology assessment.HighlightsAn increasing number of oncology drugs are licensed for multiple indications; we developed visualization methods for multi-indication evidence that consider key characteristics unique to oncology.Graphical displays can be used to show the evolution of evidence within and across multiple indications.Clear evidence visualizations can be used as a tool to support evidence synthesis approaches, support policy makers, or guide expert elicitation.

Medical Decision Making
University of Leicester (GB), Churchill Hospital (GB), Thermo Fisher Scientific (United Kingdom) (GB), Velindre Cancer Centre (GB), University of York (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Medical Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.