Real-world progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and tumor response of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in US routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Comparative cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) effectiveness data to date are limited to real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Additional effectiveness measures such as time from initial treatment to progression on first subsequent therapy (rwPFS2) and real-world tumor response (rwTR) provide full understanding of CDK4/6i real-world effectiveness. This analysis compared rwPFS2 and rwTR in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving first-line (1L) CDK4/6i plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in US routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: P-VERIFY was a retrospective Flatiron Health Research Database analysis of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who started 1L CDK4/6i (palbociclib; ribociclib; abemaciclib) plus AI between February 2015 and November 2023 (N = 9146). rwPFS2 analysis included all 9146 patients while rwTR analysis included 8010 (87.6%) patients who had ≥1 tumor response assessment. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance patient baseline characteristics. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After sIPTW, no significant differences were observed across all pairwise treatment comparisons between the CDK4/6i for rwPFS2 and rwTR (all p > 0.05). Findings were generally consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Findings were also consistent in a separate analysis of patients treated from 2017 onward, corresponding with commercial availability of all three CDK4/6i in the US. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrated no statistically significant differences in rwPFS2 and rwTR in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an AI, in routine clinical practice in the US. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT06495164.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Breast
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104780
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and tumor response of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in US routine clinical practice

Filipa C. Lynce, Melissa Soria Estévez, Rachel M. Layman, Paul Cottu et al.
The Breast
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Real-world progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and tumor response of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in US routine clinical practice

Filipa C. Lynce, Melissa Soria Estévez, Rachel M. Layman, Paul Cottu, A. B. Cohen, Lynn McRoy, Xianchen Liu, Marc Thill, Hope S. Rugo, Giuseppe Curigliano, Adam Brufsky, Benjamin Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) effectiveness data to date are limited to real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Additional effectiveness measures such as time from initial treatment to progression on first subsequent therapy (rwPFS2) and real-world tumor response (rwTR) provide full understanding of CDK4/6i real-world effectiveness. This analysis compared rwPFS2 and rwTR in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving first-line (1L) CDK4/6i plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in US routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: P-VERIFY was a retrospective Flatiron Health Research Database analysis of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who started 1L CDK4/6i (palbociclib; ribociclib; abemaciclib) plus AI between February 2015 and November 2023 (N = 9146). rwPFS2 analysis included all 9146 patients while rwTR analysis included 8010 (87.6%) patients who had ≥1 tumor response assessment. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance patient baseline characteristics. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After sIPTW, no significant differences were observed across all pairwise treatment comparisons between the CDK4/6i for rwPFS2 and rwTR (all p > 0.05). Findings were generally consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Findings were also consistent in a separate analysis of patients treated from 2017 onward, corresponding with commercial availability of all three CDK4/6i in the US. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrated no statistically significant differences in rwPFS2 and rwTR in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an AI, in routine clinical practice in the US. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT06495164.

The BreastVol. 87
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), City of Hope (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Agaplesion Markus Hospital (DE), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Pfizer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.