An explainable machine learning model for identifying the risk of suboptimal oocyte maturation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent and heterogeneous endocrine disorder and a leading cause of female infertility. Impaired oocyte maturation in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) adversely affects fertilization, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes. Identifying the underlying factors of suboptimal oocyte maturation in patients with PCOS is challenging due to heterogeneous ovarian responses and complex clinical profiles. Machine learning (ML) provides a promising approach to capture complex interactions among clinical parameters, enabling individualized risk assessment of oocyte maturation and the identification of PCOS-specific factors. A total of 759 patients with PCOS and 809 non-PCOS controls undergoing the GnRH-antagonist protocol were included and randomly divided into training and validation sets. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the Boruta algorithm. Based on 13 selected features, ten machine learning models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature importance and to distinguish PCOS-specific factors. Among ten ML models, the XGBoost model showed the best performance (AUC = 0.868). SHAP analysis identified initial timing of gonadotropin (Gn) administration, basal estradiol (E2) levels, age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and infertility duration as key contributors to oocyte maturation rate prediction in PCOS patients. Individual-level SHAP analysis further revealed substantial inter-patient heterogeneity in feature contributions, enabling personalized interpretation. Comparative modeling and SHAP interpretation in a matched non-PCOS control cohort identified distinct PCOS-specific predictors, underscoring the differential clinical relevance of key variables in PCOS versus non-PCOS populations. Our ML model effectively identified the risk of suboptimal oocyte maturation in PCOS patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol. The identified key features provide clinically interpretable insights that may inform individualized ovarian stimulation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ovarian Research
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-026-02061-6
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An explainable machine learning model for identifying the risk of suboptimal oocyte maturation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol

Wanxin Wang, Guoqing Fan, Canquan Zhou, Longying Zhao
Journal of Ovarian Research
Ovarian function and disorders
article

An explainable machine learning model for identifying the risk of suboptimal oocyte maturation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol

Wanxin Wang, Guoqing Fan, Canquan Zhou, Longying Zhao
article en

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent and heterogeneous endocrine disorder and a leading cause of female infertility. Impaired oocyte maturation in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) adversely affects fertilization, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes. Identifying the underlying factors of suboptimal oocyte maturation in patients with PCOS is challenging due to heterogeneous ovarian responses and complex clinical profiles. Machine learning (ML) provides a promising approach to capture complex interactions among clinical parameters, enabling individualized risk assessment of oocyte maturation and the identification of PCOS-specific factors. A total of 759 patients with PCOS and 809 non-PCOS controls undergoing the GnRH-antagonist protocol were included and randomly divided into training and validation sets. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the Boruta algorithm. Based on 13 selected features, ten machine learning models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature importance and to distinguish PCOS-specific factors. Among ten ML models, the XGBoost model showed the best performance (AUC = 0.868). SHAP analysis identified initial timing of gonadotropin (Gn) administration, basal estradiol (E2) levels, age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and infertility duration as key contributors to oocyte maturation rate prediction in PCOS patients. Individual-level SHAP analysis further revealed substantial inter-patient heterogeneity in feature contributions, enabling personalized interpretation. Comparative modeling and SHAP interpretation in a matched non-PCOS control cohort identified distinct PCOS-specific predictors, underscoring the differential clinical relevance of key variables in PCOS versus non-PCOS populations. Our ML model effectively identified the risk of suboptimal oocyte maturation in PCOS patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol. The identified key features provide clinically interpretable insights that may inform individualized ovarian stimulation strategies.

Journal of Ovarian Research
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.