How Does Stewardship Contracting Benefit Local Communities? A Social and Economic Assessment

Abstract This study provides the first national-level examination of the USDA Forest Service’s use of the stewardship contracting mechanism. We situate local economic benefits within the context of long-standing Forest Service priorities for supporting local community well-being and offer an empirical definition of local versus non-local contractor place of business. We created statistical models to estimate the geographic distribution of the economic benefits of stewardship contracting relative to community development needs. We find that from 2014 to 2023, when compared to conventional timber sales, stewardship contracts were associated with higher timber sale volumes but were only weakly associated with businesses based in “local” communities. However, integrated resource service contracts were strongly associated with businesses based in communities with higher development needs. We suggest methodological directions for future research on the local economic contributions of Forest Service contracting policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forestry
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44392-026-00088-7
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Stewardship Contracting Benefit Local Communities? A Social and Economic Assessment

Michael R. Coughlan, Emily Jane Davis, Harper M. Loeb, Heidi Huber-Stearns et al.
Journal of Forestry
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

How Does Stewardship Contracting Benefit Local Communities? A Social and Economic Assessment

Michael R. Coughlan, Emily Jane Davis, Harper M. Loeb, Heidi Huber-Stearns, Stephanie Schneider, James Johnston
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study provides the first national-level examination of the USDA Forest Service’s use of the stewardship contracting mechanism. We situate local economic benefits within the context of long-standing Forest Service priorities for supporting local community well-being and offer an empirical definition of local versus non-local contractor place of business. We created statistical models to estimate the geographic distribution of the economic benefits of stewardship contracting relative to community development needs. We find that from 2014 to 2023, when compared to conventional timber sales, stewardship contracts were associated with higher timber sale volumes but were only weakly associated with businesses based in “local” communities. However, integrated resource service contracts were strongly associated with businesses based in communities with higher development needs. We suggest methodological directions for future research on the local economic contributions of Forest Service contracting policies.

Journal of Forestry
Oregon State University (US), University of Oregon (US)
U.S. Forest Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.