Synergistic emission reduction effect of carbon emission trading and green finance markets: evidence from 46 Chinese cities

The global imperative to mitigate climate change requires a transition towards sustainable, low-carbon economies, with market-based mechanisms playing a pivotal role. Carbon emission trading (CET) and green finance (GF) markets have emerged as critical instruments for incentivizing emission reductions and financing sustainable transitions. However, existing research often examines these markets in isolation, leaving a significant gap in understanding their synergistic governance and combined effectiveness. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the joint carbon reduction mechanisms enabled by CET and GF market interaction. We investigate how these markets, from both market-signaling and technological-innovation perspectives, collaboratively influence emission outcomes, thereby incorporating economic, technological, and environmental sustainability dimensions into climate governance analysis. Using a systematic Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) model and panel data from 46 cities across eight pilot regions of China’s CET markets (2013–2019), this study provides robust empirical evidence on collaborative emission reduction. Findings show that both CET and GF independently suppress carbon emissions. CET operates through price signals incentivizing cost-effective abatement, while GF channels capital toward green technological innovation. Crucially, the study identifies a powerful synergy: these markets jointly foster industrial intelligent technology—enhancing energy efficiency and optimizing production processes—to support emission reduction. Moreover, environmental information disclosure positively moderates the GF-emissions relationship by reducing information asymmetry and enhancing market discipline. This research elucidates the theoretical and empirical pathways through which CET and GF interact to advance low-carbon technology and reduce emissions—a nexus previously underexplored. Achieving deep decarbonization requires well-functioning markets and policies that enhance their synergistic coupling. We recommend refining CET mechanisms to ensure robust price signals while accelerating GF market development to unlock innovation capital. Integrating industrial intelligent technology is essential to maximize joint emission reduction effects. The study provides a theoretical and empirical foundation for designing integrated policy frameworks and market mechanisms crucial for achieving carbon neutrality, highlighting the interconnectedness of financial, environmental, and technological sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Sustainability and Society
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-026-00577-9
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic emission reduction effect of carbon emission trading and green finance markets: evidence from 46 Chinese cities

Xiufan Zhang, Zitong Liao
Energy Sustainability and Society
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Synergistic emission reduction effect of carbon emission trading and green finance markets: evidence from 46 Chinese cities

Xiufan Zhang, Zitong Liao
article en

Abstract

The global imperative to mitigate climate change requires a transition towards sustainable, low-carbon economies, with market-based mechanisms playing a pivotal role. Carbon emission trading (CET) and green finance (GF) markets have emerged as critical instruments for incentivizing emission reductions and financing sustainable transitions. However, existing research often examines these markets in isolation, leaving a significant gap in understanding their synergistic governance and combined effectiveness. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the joint carbon reduction mechanisms enabled by CET and GF market interaction. We investigate how these markets, from both market-signaling and technological-innovation perspectives, collaboratively influence emission outcomes, thereby incorporating economic, technological, and environmental sustainability dimensions into climate governance analysis. Using a systematic Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) model and panel data from 46 cities across eight pilot regions of China’s CET markets (2013–2019), this study provides robust empirical evidence on collaborative emission reduction. Findings show that both CET and GF independently suppress carbon emissions. CET operates through price signals incentivizing cost-effective abatement, while GF channels capital toward green technological innovation. Crucially, the study identifies a powerful synergy: these markets jointly foster industrial intelligent technology—enhancing energy efficiency and optimizing production processes—to support emission reduction. Moreover, environmental information disclosure positively moderates the GF-emissions relationship by reducing information asymmetry and enhancing market discipline. This research elucidates the theoretical and empirical pathways through which CET and GF interact to advance low-carbon technology and reduce emissions—a nexus previously underexplored. Achieving deep decarbonization requires well-functioning markets and policies that enhance their synergistic coupling. We recommend refining CET mechanisms to ensure robust price signals while accelerating GF market development to unlock innovation capital. Integrating industrial intelligent technology is essential to maximize joint emission reduction effects. The study provides a theoretical and empirical foundation for designing integrated policy frameworks and market mechanisms crucial for achieving carbon neutrality, highlighting the interconnectedness of financial, environmental, and technological sustainability.

Energy Sustainability and SocietyVol. 16(1)
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.