Examining State Firearm Prohibitor Laws and Employment Exemptions That Regulate Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators in the United States: A Brief Report

Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects over 12 million people annually in the United States, and firearm access significantly heightens the risk of serious harm. While many states have enacted firearm prohibitor laws restricting access through domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs) and temporary restraining orders (TROs), some include employment-based exemptions that allow individuals to retain firearms due to their profession. This brief report analyzes state firearm prohibitor laws, focusing on employment exemptions, and presents legal data on the evolution of these laws nationwide. Researchers followed the policy surveillance process to create a longitudinal dataset measuring key features of firearm prohibitor laws from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2020, across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. As of January 1, 2020, 42 states enacted firearm prohibitor laws restricting firearm access through DVROs, with 20 of those states also extending restrictions through TROs. Of these 42 states, 11 had officer-based employment exemptions. These 11 states varied widely in the scope of their exemptions and the level of legal protection afforded to survivors. This analysis provides a foundational dataset and identifies employment exemptions as a critical yet understudied feature of state firearm prohibitor laws. Balancing survivor autonomy, professional roles, and public safety underscores the complexity of regulating IPV. Policymakers, courts, and law enforcement should approach the enactment, implementation, and enforcement of exemptions cautiously, ensuring survivor safety remains central. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of these laws and align legal frameworks with the best available evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-026-01066-5
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining State Firearm Prohibitor Laws and Employment Exemptions That Regulate Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators in the United States: A Brief Report

Lindsay K. Cloud, Jennifer Ibrahim, Alex Hunter Willhouse
Journal of Family Violence
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
article

Examining State Firearm Prohibitor Laws and Employment Exemptions That Regulate Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators in the United States: A Brief Report

Lindsay K. Cloud, Jennifer Ibrahim, Alex Hunter Willhouse
article en

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects over 12 million people annually in the United States, and firearm access significantly heightens the risk of serious harm. While many states have enacted firearm prohibitor laws restricting access through domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs) and temporary restraining orders (TROs), some include employment-based exemptions that allow individuals to retain firearms due to their profession. This brief report analyzes state firearm prohibitor laws, focusing on employment exemptions, and presents legal data on the evolution of these laws nationwide. Researchers followed the policy surveillance process to create a longitudinal dataset measuring key features of firearm prohibitor laws from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2020, across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. As of January 1, 2020, 42 states enacted firearm prohibitor laws restricting firearm access through DVROs, with 20 of those states also extending restrictions through TROs. Of these 42 states, 11 had officer-based employment exemptions. These 11 states varied widely in the scope of their exemptions and the level of legal protection afforded to survivors. This analysis provides a foundational dataset and identifies employment exemptions as a critical yet understudied feature of state firearm prohibitor laws. Balancing survivor autonomy, professional roles, and public safety underscores the complexity of regulating IPV. Policymakers, courts, and law enforcement should approach the enactment, implementation, and enforcement of exemptions cautiously, ensuring survivor safety remains central. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of these laws and align legal frameworks with the best available evidence.

Journal of Family Violence
Temple University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.